SEX OFFENSE-ABUSE BY EDUCATOR
Creates a crime for sexual abuse by educators/authorities of students aged 18–22, removes consent as a defense, and allows license suspensions for educators.
Creates a crime for sexual abuse by educators/authorities of students aged 18–22, removes consent as a defense, and allows license suspensions for educators.
Status and procedural history
- Introduced Feb. 4–5, 2025 (House sponsor: Rep. Amy Elik).
- Referred to Rules Committee; later reported as “Do Pass” in committee (3/12/2025).
- Passed the House (read 3rd time) on May 12, 2025.
- Co‑sponsors added: Rep. Tony M. McCombie (2/10/2025) and Rep. Ryan Spain (added 9/17/2025).
- Companion bill: SB 3135.
- Statutory changes proposed: amends the School Code (105 ILCS 5/21B‑80) and creates a new criminal offense in the Criminal Code of 2012 (720 ILCS 5/11‑9.6).
Purpose / intent
- To create a distinct criminal offense for sexual abuse by an educator or other authority figure of a student who is legally an adult but still within a student‑age range (18–22), and to make conviction for that offense a basis for licensure denial, suspension, or revocation for educators.
Key provisions
1. New offense — “Abuse by an educator or authority figure” (720 ILCS 5/11‑9.6, new):
- Elements: The defendant
- is an educator or other authority figure at the school;
- is at least four years older than the student;
- currently holds or held within the previous year a position of trust, authority, or supervision over the student in connection with an educational or extracurricular program or activity;
- and engages in either:
- sexual conduct with the student; or
- sexual penetration of the student.
- Victim age limitation: victim is at least 18 years of age but under 23 years of age.
- Consent is explicitly not a defense.
Penalty structure:
School licensure consequences (amendment to 105 ILCS 5/21B‑80):
Who is affected
- Educators and authority figures in schools (including those in extracurricular programs) who are four or more years older than a student aged 18–22.
- Students aged 18–22 (the statute protects this group when a power differential exists).
- School districts, licensing authorities (State Superintendent of Education), and employers: potential increases in investigations, license suspensions, and disciplinary actions.
- Law enforcement and prosecutors: a new statute and sentencing framework to pursue misconduct where consent might otherwise be claimed.
Practical impact and considerations
- Criminalizes sexual interactions between adult students (18–22) and adults in positions of educational authority when a clear age/power differential exists; eliminates consent as a defense in such cases.
- Strengthens grounds for administrative action against educator licenses and speeds the ability to suspend licenses while charges are pending.
- Schools may need to update policies, training, and monitoring to address interactions between staff and older students and to mitigate risk.
- The bill focuses narrowly on the educator–student power dynamic (position of trust) rather than blanket criminalization of all consensual adult relationships.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.