WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 3165

Seeds Worth Sowing funding provided, and money appropriated.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Samantha Vang

HF 3165 authorizes funding to support the Seeds Worth Sowing initiative, directing state appropriations and program administration for seed-related and related community, education

Introduction and first reading, referred to Legacy Finance
#arts #minorities
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 3165

Summary of HF 3165 (2025-2026) – Seeds Worth Sowing funding provided, and money appropriated

Overview

  • Jurisdiction: Minnesota
  • Bill number: HF 3165
  • Session: 2025-2026
  • Introduced / Action: Introduced and referred to the Legacy Finance committee on April 7, 2025
  • Sponsors: Primary sponsor not listed in the provided data; co-sponsored by Samantha Vang

Purpose and intent

HF 3165 appears to authorize funding and provide appropriations related to a program or initiative titled “Seeds Worth Sowing.” While the exact program details are not stated in the provided summary, the title suggests a focus on seed-related or agricultural/natural resources initiatives, potentially tied to community impact, urban agriculture, conservation, or small-business support within Minnesota. The bill’s placement in the Legacy Finance committee indicates a linkage to Legacy funds (often associated with the Outdoor Heritage, Clean Water, Parks, and Trails sectors) or a legacy financing framework, and signals that the appropriations are intended to support programming aligned with those priorities.

Key provisions (as typically found in a funding/appropriations bill)

  • Funding authorization: Directs the state to allocate specified dollars to support the Seeds Worth Sowing initiative.
  • Program administration: Establishes or clarifies the agency or department responsible for administering the program, along with reporting and accountability requirements.
  • Eligible activities: Outlines allowable uses of funds (e.g., seed distribution, agricultural education, community garden development, research, or conservation-related activities).
  • Matching or leverage requirements: May include requirements for matching funds, private contributions, or in-kind support to maximize impact.
  • Grant or contract mechanisms: Funds could be distributed via grants, sub-grants, or contracts to eligible organizations (nonprofits, local units of government, educational institutions, cooperatives, or community groups).
  • Performance metrics: Sets measurable outcomes (number of seeds distributed, acres established, participants trained, jobs created, or ecological benefits) and reporting timelines.
  • Sunset or review provisions: May include a sunset date or mandatory evaluation to assess program effectiveness and continuing need.
  • Compliance and oversight: Incorporates auditing, compliance with state procurement rules, and accountability to the Legislature.

Who is affected

  • Direct beneficiaries: Organizations and individuals receiving seeds, grants, or support through the Seeds Worth Sowing program.
  • State agencies/authorities: Departments designated to administer the program (likely within the legacy or environmental/agricultural portfolio), responsible for grant management, monitoring, and reporting.
  • Local governments and community groups: Potential recipients for community seed programs, gardens, educational initiatives, or conservation projects.
  • Constituents and communities: Communities benefiting from enhanced access to seeds, gardening opportunities, ecological or educational programs, and related workforce development.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Legislative path: Introduced and referred to Legacy Finance, indicating the bill will undergo committee review, potential amendments, and a fiscal analysis before floor action.
  • Funding cycle: If enacted, funding would be disbursed in alignment with fiscal years and applicable appropriation timelines established by the Legislature and the state budget.
  • Reporting cadence: Expect regular reporting to the Legislature on program progress, expenditures, and outcomes, with potential interim and/or final evaluations.

Notes

  • The provided information does not include the bill’s full text, specific dollar amounts, eligibility criteria, or detailed program design. For precise figures and administrative details, the bill’s fiscal note, draft language, and committee amendments should be consulted.
  • If you are evaluating fiscal impact, pay attention to:
    • Total appropriation and any recurring vs. one-time funds
    • Administrative costs and overhead
    • Expected leverages and matching requirements
    • Long-term sustainability and sunset provisions

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary once the bill’s full text or fiscal note is available, including exact funding amounts, eligible activities, and reporting requirements.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.