WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 455

Security Guard Agencies - Special Police Officers - Application for Appointment

2025 Regular Session Introduced by William Folden and 3 co-sponsors

Governor vetoed bill allowing private security guard agencies to commission employees as special police officers, citing policy objections to the expanded role.

Vetoed by the Governor (Policy)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 455

Legislative bill overview

SB 455 would have allowed security guard agencies to apply for appointments to commission their employees as special police officers in Maryland. The bill passed through the legislature but was vetoed by the Governor on May 16, 2025, citing policy concerns.

Why is this important

This legislation directly affects the authority and training requirements for private security personnel, determining whether they could exercise limited police powers. The veto suggests the Governor had concerns about accountability, training standards, or the appropriate role of private security in law enforcement functions.

Potential points of contention

  • Accountability and oversight: Private security companies may lack the same public accountability mechanisms as municipal police departments, raising concerns about misconduct oversight
  • Training and certification standards: Questions about whether security guards would meet equivalent training requirements as sworn officers before receiving special police authority
  • Cost and privatization concerns: Potential opposition from law enforcement unions or advocates concerned about privatizing police functions versus maintaining public control

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.