Bill
HB 2793
Arizona: Establishes a single statewide standardized voter registration form with uniform address rules and mandatory audits/training to ensure accurate residency data. Illinois:
Note: The materials you provided appear to include text from two different bills both labeled “HB 2793” (one from Arizona concerning voter registration forms and one from Illinois concerning teacher evaluations). Below are concise, clearly separated summaries of each bill so you can review both. If you want a deeper focus on one, tell me which state/version to expand.
Topic: Standardized voter registration forms; addresses; audits; training; enforcement
Summary
- Purpose: Require a single, statewide standardized voter registration form and uniform rules for recording residential and mailing (PO Box) addresses to improve consistency, accuracy, and verification of voter residency.
- Sponsor: Rep. Walt Blackman.
- Status (as provided): Introduced Feb 13, 2025; read/referred; Rule 19(a) / re‑referred to Rules Committee.
Key provisions
- Secretary of State duty: Develop and maintain a standardized voter registration form to be used by all counties and election officials.
- Required fields: applicant’s full legal name, date of birth, residential physical address (required), mailing address (may be PO Box), contact info (phone and optional email), citizenship affirmation, declaration of eligibility and signature.
- Format consistency: Form layout, font and format standardized statewide per the Secretary of State.
- PO Box rules: PO Box allowed only as mailing address and may not replace the required residential address. Secretary of State must set formatting guidelines for PO Boxes and, together with county recorders, enforce uniform entry to avoid clerical errors.
- Alternative addresses: For persons without traditional residential addresses, an alternative descriptive address is required in addition to PO Box info.
- Verification and compliance: Secretary of State and county recorders must verify address requirements and maintain residency verification.
- Adoption timeline: All counties must adopt the standardized form and PO Box formatting requirements within one year of the section’s effective date.
- Audits, training, education: Secretary of State will conduct regular audits of county compliance, may take corrective actions, provide guidance/training to election officials, and prepare voter‑education materials and instructions.
- Rulemaking/implementation: Provisions may be included in the Secretary of State’s instructions and procedures manual (per ARS §16‑452).
- Enforcement/penalty: Knowingly providing false information (including misrepresenting physical address or PO Box) is false registration under ARS §16‑182.
Who’s affected
- Secretary of State; county recorders and all county election officials; prospective and registered voters (especially those using PO Boxes or without traditional residential addresses).
Potential impacts
- Increased uniformity in voter registration records and data entry.
- Stronger audit and training regime aimed at reducing clerical errors and false registrations.
- Administrative changes for counties to adopt standardized forms and formatting within one year.
Topic: School Code amendments; teacher evaluation classifications; waivers; Chicago-specific procedures
Summary
- Purpose: Amend multiple sections of the Illinois School Code to change teacher evaluation rating categories and make related adjustments to evaluation, dismissal, licensure, and waiver procedures; facilitate local flexibility and align record ratings into two broad categories for employment purposes.
- Sponsor (from text): Rep. Nicholas K. Smith.
- Status (as provided): Introduced Feb 6, 2025 (Illinois General Assembly), various committee assignments per bill text. Text indicates immediate effect for many provisions.
Key provisions
- Rating reclassification (effective Sept 1, 2026): All existing teacher evaluation ratings of “excellent,” “proficient,” or “needs improvement” are to be considered “effective”; ratings of “unsatisfactory” are considered “ineffective” for purposes of Employment of Teachers provisions.
- School Code edits: Amends or adds numerous sections (e.g., 2‑3.25g; 10‑17a; 21B‑75; new 24‑9.5; 24‑11; 24‑12; 24‑16.5; 24A‑5; 24A‑5.5; 34‑84; 34‑85c) affecting:
- Waiver or modification of mandates and local flexibility procedures (requests to State Board; requirements for public hearings and fiscal analyses).
- School report cards and accountability metrics.
- License suspension or revocation processes.
- Procedures for contractual continued service, removal/dismissal of teachers, and optional alternative evaluative dismissal processes.
- Content and procedures for evaluation plans, and special or alternative procedures in Chicago (appointment/promotion; remediation/removal).
- Effective date language: The bill text indicates immediate effect for many changes, while the reclassification of ratings is specified to take effect on or after Sept 1, 2026.
Who’s affected
- Teachers (statewide, with specific Chicago provisions), school districts, regional offices of education, State Board of Education, school boards and administrators, unions and bargaining units, and students (through implications for staffing and evaluations).
Potential impacts
- Simplifies historic evaluation records into binary categories (“effective” vs. “ineffective”) for employment decisions after Sept. 1, 2026 — could affect tenure, dismissal, remediation, and contract decisions.
- Grants or clarifies waiver/modification pathways for districts seeking flexibility from certain state mandates (subject to public process and fiscal analysis).
- Changes to evaluator plans, dismissal procedures, and licensure actions could alter how districts manage underperforming teachers and implement improvement/removal processes, including distinct rules for Chicago.
Procedural notes and caveat
- The provided Illinois bill text is relatively detailed but truncated in places; it explicitly amends several School Code sections and adds a new section (24‑9.5). The bill asserts immediate effect in part, with the rating reclassification date specified as Sept 1, 2026.
- Because the materials you provided mix two distinct HB 2793 bills (Arizona and Illinois), confirm which state/version you want a fuller analysis of (legal text, fiscal note, stakeholder impacts, or amendment history).
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
