Bill
S 1242
Revises penalties for underage gambling in licensed casinos to give courts discretion to fine ($500-$1,000) and require compulsive gambling treatment programs.
Important note on sources and inconsistencies
- The materials provided for "S 1242" are inconsistent and appear to combine texts from different jurisdictions and topics (a New Jersey amendment on casino gambling by underage persons; a Massachusetts bill on juvenile pre‑adjudication credit; assorted legislative action dates and sponsor names). This summary focuses on the primary enacted/introduced text supplied (an amendment to P.L.1977, c.110 — C.5:12‑119) because that text contains clear substantive changes. Verify the correct jurisdiction and official bill text before relying on this summary for legal or policy decisions.
Purpose and intent
- The core provision revises the penalty scheme for persons who enter or wager in licensed casinos or simulcasting facilities while under the age at which they are authorized to purchase and consume alcoholic beverages (statutory language). The intent is to give courts discretion over monetary fines and to allow courts to require participation in compulsive‑gambling prevention, education, and treatment programs.
Key provisions and changes
- Statutory amendment: modifies section 119 of P.L.1977, c.110 (C.5:12‑119).
- Underage entry/wagering:
- Continues to prohibit persons under the legal age from entering or wagering in licensed casinos and simulcasting facilities (with limited exceptions for passage or licensed persons acting in performance of duties).
- Maintains that violation is a disorderly persons offense.
- Changes the fine from mandatory language to discretionary: a court "may" impose a fine of not less than $500 and not more than $1,000 (previously framed as required).
- Adds that the court may require the offender to participate in a compulsive gambling prevention, education, and treatment program that meets criteria developed pursuant to P.L.1993, c.229 (C.26:2‑169) (for example, programs provided by the Council on Compulsive Gambling of New Jersey).
- Licensees/employees:
- Retains existing offense for a casino licensee or employee who allows an underage person to remain or wager in a facility (disorderly persons offense).
- Preserves the statutory defenses where the licensee/employee reasonably relied on written representation of age, appearance, and good‑faith admission.
- Caretakers:
- Retains offense for a person who knowingly allows someone in their lawful custody (and under the legal drinking age) to wager or attempt to wager.
- Effective date: the act takes effect immediately upon enactment.
Who is affected
- Primary: persons below the legal age to purchase/consume alcohol who enter or wager in licensed casinos and simulcasting facilities.
- Secondary: casino licensees and employees (enforcement and defense standards unchanged), and caretakers or guardians who permit underage wagering.
- Tertiary: courts (new discretion to order treatment), compulsive‑gambling program providers (potential increase in referrals), and agencies that develop program criteria (referenced statute from 1993).
Potential impacts and considerations
- Policy shift toward treatment: giving courts authority to require participation in prevention/education/treatment programs moves enforcement partly toward rehabilitative/education responses rather than solely monetary penalties.
- Administrative effects: courts will need access to qualified compulsive‑gambling programs that meet statutory criteria; program capacity and funding could become issues if referrals increase.
- Deterrence and recidivism: discretionary fines paired with mandated treatment could reduce repeat violations if programs are effective, but empirical outcomes would depend on program quality and compliance monitoring.
- Legal predictability: discretionary fines may lead to variation in sentencing; guidance or sentencing practices may be needed to ensure consistency.
Procedural/timeline status (from provided materials)
- The text indicates immediate effect upon enactment. The legislative history and committee referrals included in the provided materials are inconsistent (various dates and committees across different states). Confirm the correct bill number, sponsoring legislature, committee status, and hearing schedule with the official legislative source for the relevant state.
If you want
- I can: (1) locate and summarize the official bill text for the correct jurisdiction if you confirm which state/legislature this S 1242 applies to; or (2) prepare a short impact memo comparing the current mandatory fine approach to the bill’s discretionary/treatment approach.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
