WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 384

Revises provisions relating to deputy marshals in certain courts. (BDR 1-943)

2025 Regular Session Introduced by James Ohrenschall

Nevada bill to modify deputy marshal regulations in specific courts failed to advance before legislative deadline.

(Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1, no further action allowed.)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 384

Legislative bill overview

SB 384 proposes revisions to Nevada's provisions governing deputy marshals operating within certain courts. The bill was introduced by James Ohrenschall but did not advance beyond committee referral before becoming ineligible for further action under legislative rules.

Why is this important

Deputy marshals provide security and law enforcement functions within court systems, so revisions to their authority, qualifications, or operational procedures could affect courtroom safety, officer responsibilities, and judicial operations. Changes to these provisions could also have fiscal implications for court budgets and staff management.

Potential points of contention

  • Lack of available details: The bill's specific proposed changes are not disclosed in the legislative summary, making it difficult to assess whether provisions expand or restrict deputy marshal authority, duties, or resources
  • Court security vs. operational costs: Any expansion of deputy marshal roles or authority may require budget increases, while restrictions could raise concerns about courthouse safety
  • Jurisdictional scope: The phrase "certain courts" is vague and could create inconsistent standards across Nevada's judicial system depending on which courts are affected

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.