WeVote
Log In

Bill

SF

Bill

HB 113

Revise resident preferences for public contracts and contract term limits

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Steve Fitzpatrick

HB 113 would alter Montana's in-state contractor preferences and contract duration limits for public procurement, affecting state spending and local business opportunities.

(H) Died in Process
#stategovernment #publiccontracts
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 113

Legislative bill overview

HB 113 proposes changes to Montana's public contracting rules, specifically modifying preferences given to in-state residents and businesses when bidding on state contracts, while also adjusting limits on how long contracts can be awarded for. The bill would revise existing residency preference policies that currently prioritize Montana-based contractors.

Why is this important

Public contracting policies directly affect state spending efficiency, job creation, and business competitiveness. Residency preferences can increase costs to taxpayers but support local economies, while removing them may lower costs but could shift work out of state. Contract term limits affect budget predictability and contractor stability for ongoing services.

Potential points of contention

  • Economic protectionism vs. fiscal efficiency: Supporters argue residency preferences protect Montana jobs and businesses; critics contend they increase procurement costs and may violate free market principles
  • Interstate commerce concerns: Changes could trigger legal challenges under the Commerce Clause if they discriminate against out-of-state businesses
  • Contract stability: Modifying term limits affects whether contractors can plan long-term projects or whether the state maintains flexibility to switch providers

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.