WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 1136

Review procedures of building applications by government entities established.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Steve Elkins

The bill aims to review and reform government processing of building permit applications to improve efficiency, transparency, and accountability.

Motion to recall and re-refer, motion prevailed Elections Finance and Government Operations
#buildingsandbuildingcodes #governmentaloperations-local #governmentaloperations-state
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 1136

Summary of HF 1136 (2025-2026) – Minnesota

Overview

HF 1136 seeks to review and possibly revise the procedures by which government entities establish and process building applications. The bill appears to focus on the administrative and procedural steps used by government agencies or departments in relation to building permit applications, approvals, and related reviews. The exact statutory changes are not provided in the brief, but the title indicates a formal review of current procedures with potential reforms or guidance.

  • Session: 2025-2026
  • Jurisdiction: Minnesota
  • Official Title: Review procedures of building applications by government entities established.
  • Sponsor: Co-sponsor Steve Elkins
  • Initial Action: Introduction and first reading on 2025-02-19; referred to committee
  • Subsequent Action: 2025-03-27 – Motion to recall and re-refer, motion prevailed (Elections Finance and Government Operations)

Purpose and Intent

  • To evaluate the existing processes that government entities use when handling building permit applications and related reviews.
  • To identify inefficiencies, redundancies, or barriers in the current procedures.
  • To establish a framework for potential reforms to ensure timeliness, transparency, and accountability in building application reviews.

Key Provisions (Inferred)

While the specific text of HF 1136 is not provided, the bill’s title and action history suggest several potential areas of focus:
- Procedural Reform: Review and possible modernization of application intake, routing, timelines, and decision-making workflows for building permits.
- Transparency and Accountability: Measures to improve public access to application status, criteria, and decisions; clearer reporting requirements for agencies.
- Efficiency and Timeliness: Standards or benchmarks for processing times; procedures to reduce unnecessary delays.
- Interagency Coordination: Requirements for coordination among different government entities (e.g., planning, zoning, building, environmental review) involved in building applications.
- Public Engagement: Opportunities for public input or notification enhancements related to building permit applications.
- Protection of Rightful Approvals/Appeals: Safeguards to ensure due process in reviews and avenues for timely appeals or reconsiderations.

Note: The exact provisions would be defined in the bill’s text. The title indicates a focus on “review procedures” rather than wholesale overhaul of permitting authority.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Government Entities: Agencies and departments responsible for issuing or reviewing building permits (planning, building, zoning, code enforcement, environmental review, etc.).
  • Applicants: Developers, property owners, contractors, and general members of the public who submit building permit applications.
  • Local Jurisdictions: Cities, counties, and regional authorities involved in building permitting processes.
  • Oversight Bodies: Legislative committees or state offices assigned to monitor and implement procedural reforms.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction and Referral: The bill was introduced on 2025-02-19 and referred to State Government Finance and Policy for initial consideration.
  • Committee Action: On 2025-03-27, a motion to recall and re-refer passed in Elections Finance and Government Operations, indicating an alteration in committee routing and potential further study before floor consideration.
  • Next Steps: If advanced, HF 1136 would likely move to additional committee hearings, potential amendments, and, depending on Senate coordination, floor votes. Timelines would depend on committee scheduling and legislative priorities.

Practical Implications

  • If enacted, the bill could lead to:
    • Streamlined processing times for building applications.
    • Clearer statutory guidance on responsibilities and timelines for agencies.
    • Enhanced transparency in application status and decision criteria.
    • Improved coordination across multiple government entities involved in permitting.

Note

  • The available information does not include the bill’s exact textual provisions, specific reforms, or fiscal implications. For a precise understanding, the bill’s text, committee analyses, and fiscal notes would be needed.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.