WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 76

Requiring employees of school districts and postsecondary educational institutions to use the name and pronouns consistent with a student's biological sex and birth certificate and authorizing a cause of action for violations therefor.

2025-2026 Regular Session

Kansas bill requiring schools to use students' biological-sex names and pronouns, allowing lawsuits for violations, faces conflict with medical guidance and existing civil rights law.

Stricken from Calendar by Rule 1507
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 76

Legislative bill overview

SB 76 would require school district and postsecondary institution employees to address students using names and pronouns that match their biological sex and birth certificate records. The bill creates a legal cause of action, meaning individuals could potentially sue for violations of this requirement.

Why is this important

This bill directly addresses how transgender and non-binary students are identified in educational settings. It affects the daily interactions between students and educators, school policies on records and communications, and could significantly impact the school experience for a subset of students while raising questions about institutional liability and legal obligations.

Potential points of contention

  • Conflict with student mental health standards: Major medical organizations (AMA, AAP, APA) support gender-affirming care, which typically includes using chosen names/pronouns; this bill contradicts that guidance
  • Religious/conscience objection clarity: The bill doesn't address whether employees can claim religious or philosophical exemptions, potentially creating conflicting legal obligations
  • Enforcement and litigation burden: Creating a cause of action could result in significant legal costs for schools and uncertainty about what constitutes a violation or adequate remedy
  • Practical implementation challenges: Schools would need to navigate federal non-discrimination laws (Title IX) and state constitutional protections that may conflict with this mandate
  • Impact scope: Affects vulnerable minors in institutional settings with limited ability to opt out or seek alternative environments

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.