WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 3680

Requires the office of parks, recreation and historic preservation to review the policies of the department of parks and recreation of the city of New York regarding trees and tree maintenance

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Leroy Comrie

Requires NY OPRHP to review NYC Parks' tree policies and maintenance; findings could influence urban forestry standards and city operations.

REFERRED TO CULTURAL AFFAIRS, TOURISM, PARKS AND RECREATION
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 3680

Summary of S 3680

Overview

S 3680 would require the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) to review the policies of the City of New York’s Department of Parks and Recreation regarding trees and tree maintenance. The bill was introduced on January 29, 2025 and referred to the Senate committee on Cultural Affairs, Tourism, Parks and Recreation.

What the bill would do

  • Mandates a formal review by OPRHP of NYC Parks’ policies on trees and tree maintenance.
  • The summary provided does not specify additional details such as the review’s scope, methodologies, deliverables (e.g., a report), timeline for completion, or potential recommendations.

Who is affected

  • State Level: OPRHP would conduct the mandated review.
  • City Level: The City of New York, through its Department of Parks and Recreation, whose tree policies would be reviewed.
  • Public stakeholders could be affected indirectly through any findings, recommendations, or changes resulting from the review.

Procedural status and timeline

  • Introduced: January 29, 2025.
  • Legislative action: Referred to the Committee on Cultural Affairs, Tourism, Parks and Recreation (Senate).
  • No further actions, amendments, or reporting requirements are provided in the information available.

Related legislation

  • S 4332 (prior-session)
  • S 5738 (prior-session)
  • S 2455 (prior-session)

Potential implications and considerations

  • The bill establishes state-level oversight by requiring a review of NYC Parks’ tree policies, which could inform state understanding of urban forestry practices and tree maintenance standards.
  • Without the full text, details on reporting requirements, anticipated timelines, cost implications, or potential post-review actions remain unclear.
  • The bill’s impact would depend on the review’s findings and any subsequent proposals or legislative actions triggered by the results.

Next steps for readers

  • Obtain the bill text for specifics on scope, deliverables, and timelines.
  • Monitor subsequent committee actions or amendments to understand any mandated reporting or follow-up measures.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.