WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 3053

Directs the New York state bridge authority to provide a report outlining their efforts and progress on decreasing and deterring suicide attempts on authority bridges

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Nathalia Fernández and 7 co-sponsors

Requires contracts between municipalities/parking authorities and online parking payment providers to not charge users when parking is prohibited or free.

PRINT NUMBER 3053A
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 3053

Summary — S 3053

Note on documents provided
- The materials supplied for S 3053 are internally inconsistent. The bill title you gave (“Requires the installation of climb deterrent fencing on certain bridges”) does not match the committee report text included below, which amends the Local Public Contracts Law to regulate online parking payment services. There is also an unrelated federal draft text about nuclear security and an inconsistent sponsor list. This summary focuses on the substantive committee-reported text provided (the committee amendment reported June 5, 2025) and flags the inconsistencies at the end.

Overview / Purpose

As amended and reported by the Senate Community and Urban Affairs Committee (June 5, 2025), S 3053 would require that contracts between a municipality or a parking authority and an online parking payment service provider include a term prohibiting the provider from charging a user a parking fee during any time when parking at the applicable parking project is either prohibited or designated free.

Key provisions

  • Requires that contracts governed by the Local Public Contracts Law between a municipality or parking authority and an online parking payment service provider include a stipulation that the service provider must not charge a user for parking during time periods when:
    • parking is prohibited at the parking project; or
    • parking is free at the parking project.
  • Defines “online parking payment service” as a public-facing internet website, web application, or computer/mobile application that allows a user to submit payment for parking a motor vehicle at a publicly available parking project.
  • Committee amendment: applies the requirement via the Local Public Contracts Law (instead of the originally cited statutory sections, R.S.40:52-1 and the Parking Authority Law).

Who is affected

  • Municipalities and parking authorities that contract with third-party online parking payment providers.
  • Online parking payment service providers (public-facing websites/apps) that accept payments for parking at publicly available parking projects.
  • Motorists/users of these online parking payment services — they would be protected from being charged when parking is prohibited or free.
  • Potentially local enforcement and contract administrators (they must ensure contracts contain the required clause and that providers comply).

Procedural status and timeline

  • Reported favorably with committee amendments by the Senate Community and Urban Affairs Committee (dated June 5, 2025).
  • Listed status: REFERRED TO FINANCE.
  • The documents also list a companion Assembly bill A-3765 (1R).
  • Note: supplied legislative action dates and sponsor lists contain inconsistencies; the committee report indicates Senator Paul D. Moriarty as sponsor with Sen. Wimberly as co-sponsor.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Operational: providers may need to change software/terms to detect prohibited/free periods and disable charges or issue refunds.
  • Contracting: municipalities/parking authorities must include the new contractual clause and monitor compliance.
  • Consumer protection: prevents users being charged for unavailable or free parking.
  • Implementation complexity: defining and communicating “prohibited” and “free” times to third-party vendors, and coordinating real-time status changes (e.g., special events, temporary closures).
  • Enforcement and remedies for violations would depend on contract language and existing procurement/contract enforcement mechanisms.

Related legislation

  • Companion: A-3765 (1R).
  • Prior-session related bills listed in supplied materials (S 7310, S 2708, A 4821), though their content was not detailed here.

If you want, I can:
- Produce a clean one-page brief for municipal procurement officers explaining what contractual language to adopt; or
- Investigate and summarize the alternate “climb deterrent fencing on bridges” version if you provide the correct text for that bill.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.