WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 8048

Requires the department of parks, recreation and historic preservation cut down trees within two weeks of receiving notice

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Leroy Comrie

Requires the Dept. of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to cut down trees within 14 days of receiving notice, forcing faster removals and affecting staffing and budgeting.

REFERRED TO CITIES 1
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 8048

Summary of Bill S 8048

Overview

Bill S 8048 would require the Department of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to cut down trees within two weeks of receiving notice. The bill is introduced and currently in committee consideration, having been referred to the Cities 1 committee.

  • Sponsor (primary): Leroy Comrie
  • Introduced: May 15, 2025
  • Current status: Referred to Cities 1
  • Legislative actions (per provided record): May 15, 2025 — Referred to Cities 1 (listed twice in the record)

Purpose and Intent

  • The central purpose of S 8048 is to establish a firm, time-bound requirement for tree removal by the Department of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. Specifically, once the department receives notice, it must ensure that the applicable trees are cut down within a 14-day window.

Key Provisions (as indicated by the title and available record)

  • Timing requirement: The department must cut down trees within two weeks (14 days) after receipt of notice.
  • Agency subject to the requirement: Department of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation.
  • Causation/trigger: The removal obligation is triggered by the department receiving a notice (the record does not specify who can provide notice, how notice is given, or what constitutes valid notice).

Note: The full text of the bill is not provided in the record available here. The above reflects the stated purpose in the bill’s title and the cited action items.

Affected Parties and Potential Impact

  • Affected entity: The Department of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation and its operations related to tree removal.
  • Potential impacts:
    • Operational: An accelerated removal timeline may affect staffing, budgeting, and scheduling for tree removal projects.
    • Safety/maintenance: Could lead to more rapid clearance after notice, potentially addressing hazards or maintenance needs more quickly.
    • Environmental considerations: If not balanced with environmental preservation policies, a strict two-week deadline could raise concerns about preserving significant trees or ecological considerations.
    • Administrative: Clarification would be needed on what constitutes “notice,” who can issue it, and any exceptions or exemptions (not specified in the provided record).

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction date: May 15, 2025.
  • Referral: Referred to the Cities 1 committee (record shows this referral date twice, which may reflect multiple entries in the legislative record).
  • Next steps: The bill will typically move through committee discussion, possible amendments, and then floor consideration. Tracking its status in the Cities 1 committee and any subsequent actions will indicate whether it advances, is amended, or stalled.

Additional Notes

  • The summary above is based on the bill’s title and the limited details provided. The full legislative text would specify definitions (e.g., what constitutes notice, which trees are covered, exemptions, funding, penalties or compliance mechanisms), procedural requirements, and any related oversight provisions.

If you want, I can incorporate any new text from the bill once it becomes publicly available to provide a more detailed, provision-by-provision summary.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.