WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 299

Requires public employers who opt out of providing paid family leave benefits to provide parental leave in the alternative

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Brian Cunningham and 2 co-sponsors

Requires public employers that opt out of paid family leave to offer parental leave instead, ensuring public workers still get protected time off for caregiving.

REFERRED TO LABOR
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 299

Summary of Bill A 299

Overview

Bill A 299, introduced January 8, 2025, is currently REFERRED TO LABOR. The primary sponsor is Jenifer Rajkumar, with cosponsors Sarahana Shrestha and Brian Cunningham. The bill’s title indicates it would require public employers who opt out of providing paid family leave benefits to provide parental leave as an alternative.

Purpose and Intent

  • Ensure that employees of public employers who choose not to provide paid family leave still receive a form of protected parental leave.
  • Create parity between the option to opt out of paid family leave and the provision of parental leave benefits to public employees.

Key Provisions (as described by the bill’s title and status)

  • Public employers that opt out of providing paid family leave benefits must instead offer parental leave.
  • The bill would presumably define terms such as who qualifies for parental leave, its duration, eligibility, and any wage replacement or job protection, though the specific details would be in the text of the bill itself.
  • The mechanism by which an opt-out is exercised, monitored, and enforced would be established in the statutory language.

Who Would be Affected

  • Public employers (e.g., state and local government employers) that currently opt out of paid family leave benefits.
  • Public sector employees covered by the opt-out arrangement, who would receive parental leave as an alternative benefit.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Status: Referred to the Assembly Standing Committee on Labor.
  • Action history shows two entries on 2025-01-08 noting the referral to LABOR (the duplicate entry appears in the legislative actions log).
  • Related and companion legislation exists, suggesting alignment with broader paid family leave policy discussions:
    • A 10352 (prior-session)
    • A 2752 (prior-session)
    • S 1193 (companion)

Related Legislation and Context

  • The existence of companion bills (S 1193) and prior-session A bills (A 10352, A 2752) indicates ongoing interest in aligning paid family leave policies with public-employer parental leave obligations across chambers.

Potential Impacts and Considerations

  • For public employers: possible administrative changes to implement and monitor an opt-out-parental-leave framework; potential cost implications depending on how parental leave is funded and administered.
  • For employees: assurance of a parental leave benefit even if paid family leave is not provided, potentially improving work-life balance and job protection during parental responsibilities.
  • For policymakers: need to define key terms (eligibility, duration, pay structure) and ensure clear enforcement, funding sources, and consistency with existing labor laws.

Where to Find More Information

  • The bill text and status updates can be found on the official legislative website under A 299, along with related companion bills (e.g., S 1193) and prior-session references.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.