WeVote

Bill

Bill

S 3420

Requires juvenile charged with delinquent act to be prosecuted in county where incident giving rise to complaint occurred.

2024-2025 Regular Session Introduced by Jon Bramnick

Juvenile delinquency venue now set in the incident's county, removing the domicile rule and possibly shifting travel, resources, and caseload to the incident county.

Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Law and Public Safety Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 3420

Summary of Senate Bill S 3420

Quick take

S 3420 would require that a juvenile charged with a delinquent act be prosecuted in the county where the incident giving rise to the delinquency complaint occurred. The bill amends the Juvenile Delinquency Act (P.L.1982, c.77) to make venue location mandatory, removing the current domicile-based exception in certain cases.

What the bill does

  • Amends Section 5 of P.L.1982, c.77 (C.2A:4A-24) to specify that, when a juvenile is charged with a delinquent act, venue shall be laid in the county where the incident giving rise to the delinquency complaint allegedly occurred.
  • Keeps other provisions of the act intact, including jurisdiction over delinquency matters and related juvenile-family crises, custody of material witnesses, and wards-of-the-court status.
  • Effective date: immediate upon enactment.

Context and current law

  • Under existing New Jersey practice (Court Rules), delinquency complaints are filed in the county where the incident occurred. If the juvenile resides in a different county, venue is typically laid in the juvenile’s county of domicile unless good cause is shown to keep venue in the incident county.
  • S 3420 would remove the domicile exception by mandating venue in the incident’s county, regardless of the juvenile’s domicile.

Key provisions

  • Section 5.a: Court retains exclusive jurisdiction over delinquency cases and related matters, with clear rehabilitation plans.
  • Section 5.e: Explicitly requires venue to be in the incident’s county.
  • Other subsections preserve jurisdictional principles, material witness custody, ward status, and age-related jurisdiction limits.

Who is affected

  • Juveniles charged with delinquent acts.
  • Parents, guardians, or family members whose conduct may be implicated in juvenile-family crises.
  • Prosecutors, defense counsel, judges, and court staff.
  • County governments and local law enforcement in the incident’s county.

Procedural and timeline notes

  • Introduced: January 27, 2025.
  • Status: Referred to Senate Law and Public Safety Committee (per the bill’s basic status; additional entries show Jan 27, 2025 referral to Budget and Revenue).
  • Sponsor: Senator George Borrello (primary).

Potential impact considerations

  • Legal/process: Greater alignment of venue with the location of the alleged act; potential reduction of venue disputes.
  • Practical effects: Juveniles and families may face travel or logistical burdens if the incident county differs from their residence.
  • Resource implications: Incident counties may experience shifts in caseload and required juvenile court resources.

Related items

  • Related or companion bills include A 2337 (and others listed in the bill’s documentation).

This summary captures the bill’s main purpose, substantive changes, who would be affected, and key procedural details.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.