WeVote

Bill

Bill

S 2243

Requires highway projects that receive state funding to include the installation of broadband conduits and provides for access to such conduits

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Jeremy Cooney and 3 co-sponsors

Requires state-funded highway work to install empty broadband conduits, creating nondiscriminatory access for providers and accelerating cheaper, wider broadband deployment.

REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 2243

Note: the materials you provided appear to contain mixed and conflicting texts. The bill title and your initial Bill Information describe a measure requiring state-funded highway projects to install broadband conduits. However, the inserted bill text largely contains an unrelated Massachusetts bill (Senate No. 2243) about outdoor lighting, dark‑sky protections, and energy conservation, and there is additional extraneous text from a New Jersey community‑schools bill. Below I (1) summarize what the broadband‑conduit bill implied by your title would typically do (because no complete text for that bill was provided), and (2) summarize the actual Massachusetts outdoor‑lighting text included in your packet so you can see what that document would do if enacted. Please tell me which version you want finalized or supply the correct bill text if you want a single authoritative summary.

1) Summary — Title: “Requires highway projects that receive state funding to include the installation of broadband conduits and provides for access to such conduits” (no full text provided)
- Purpose and intent
- To lower the cost and speed deployment of broadband by requiring that state‑funded highway construction and major repair projects install empty (dark) fiber conduit or conduit-ready infrastructure concurrently with roadway work.
- Key provisions (typical elements such a bill contains)
- Applicability: all state DOT capital highway projects (or projects above a dollar threshold) funded in whole or in part with state funds.
- Conduit installation requirements: installation of empty conduits, placement of junction boxes/manholes at set intervals or at logical crossing/utility points, and specification of conduit size and materials consistent with telecom standards.
- Access and use: nondiscriminatory access procedures allowing utilities, ISPs, municipalities and anchor institutions to lease or use conduit capacity; rules for attachment fees and permitting.
- Coordination and planning: requirement to coordinate with the state broadband office/agency and local governments, and map new conduit in a public inventory.
- Cost allocation & funding: how incremental conduit costs are allocated (often covered by project budgets, state broadband funds, or incremental participant payments); possible grant match language.
- Exceptions & waivers: where installation is impractical or unsafe, or when adequate conduit already exists.
- Reporting & timeline: agency reporting obligations, effective dates, and timelines for implementation.
- Who is affected
- State DOT, contractors, broadband providers, utilities, municipalities, and project funders; ultimately residents and businesses (especially unserved/underserved) who gain lower‑cost broadband expansion.
- Potential impact
- Upfront modest cost increases for highway projects; substantial long‑term cost savings and faster broadband buildout, reduced future construction disruption, and improved digital equity.

2) Summary — Actual included Bill Text (Massachusetts Senate No. 2243 — “An Act to improve outdoor lighting, conserve energy, and increase dark‑sky visibility”)
- Purpose and intent
- To reduce energy waste and light pollution, protect dark skies, and ensure state/municipal funds are not used to install or operate outdoor lighting that creates glare, sky glow, or light trespass.
- Key provisions and changes
- Adds new Section 38 to Chapter 85 of the General Laws with detailed definitions (CCT, fixture, fully shielded, façade lighting, ornamental lighting, uplight, lumens, municipal/state funds, etc.).
- By Jan 1, 2026 the Department of Energy Resources (DOER), in consultation with MassDOT and the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security, must adopt regulations that:
- Require roadway and parking‑lot fixtures funded with state/municipal funds to be fully shielded (with limited exceptions for ornamental fixtures and tunnels/underpasses).
- Limit uplight and set lumen/uplight caps for ornamental fixtures.
- Limit fixture quantity to the amount necessary for safe vehicular and pedestrian travel, referencing FHWA and IES guidance.
- Require building‑mounted fixtures to be fully shielded except façade lighting, which must be directed and shielded to minimize glare/trespass.
- Limit correlated color temperature (CCT) of installed fixtures to a regulation limit not to exceed 3000 K, with exemptions for demonstrated public safety needs, decorative color illumination, and athletic fields.
- Require maintained illuminance no higher than industry standards unless a verified safety/security need requires higher levels; municipal/county lower limits control if stricter.
- Enumerates exemptions (emergency/temporary lighting, navigational aviation/nautical lighting, compelling safety needs, replacements in certain cases, etc.).
- Who is affected
- State and local governments, public safety agencies, contractors, municipalities, lighting specifiers, and vendors; communities desiring reduced light pollution; athletic facilities and historic sites subject to limited exemptions.
- Procedural/timeline aspects
- DOER to promulgate regulations by Jan 1, 2026; regulatory consultation required with MassDOT and public safety; statutory definitions and compliance required for state/municipal‑funded projects.
- Potential impact
- Reduced light pollution and energy use, improved night‑sky visibility, potential retrofitting costs for non‑compliant planned projects, clarified standards for procurement of outdoor lighting with state or municipal funds.

Other notes
- Legislative actions and sponsor lists in your packet appear inconsistent (multiple referrals across committees and multiple sponsors from different jurisdictions). If you want an exact summary tied to a single official bill (text, sponsor list, committee referrals, and legislative status), please provide the correct, single bill text or indicate which version (broadband conduit or outdoor lighting) to focus on.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.