WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 5275

Requires certain artificial intelligence developers to make certain disclosures to Attorney General.

2026-2027 Regular Session

AI developers must disclose specified information to the New Jersey Attorney General to increase oversight, transparency, and accountability of AI systems.

Introduced, Referred to Assembly Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 5275

Summary of A-5275 (New Jersey, 2022 Session 222)

Purpose and intent

  • An act titled Requires certain artificial intelligence developers to make certain disclosures to Attorney General.
  • The bill seeks to impose specific disclosure obligations on developers of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, with the aim of increasing oversight and accountability by providing information to the New Jersey Attorney General.

Key provisions and changes

  • Disclosure obligation to the Attorney General: AI developers meeting the bill’s criteria must provide specified information to the New Jersey Attorney General. The exact scope and nature of disclosures (e.g., types of AI systems covered, data practices, risk assessments, governance structures) would be defined in the bill's text.
  • Scope of entities covered: The bill targets “certain AI developers,” which typically refers to entities that develop and deploy AI systems with potential impact on consumers or public interest. The precise thresholds (e.g., size of the company, type of AI product, use cases) would be detailed in the statute.
  • Contents of disclosures: While the specific items are not provided in the summary, such measures commonly include:
    • Description of the AI system, its intended use, and performance characteristics.
    • Data privacy and security practices, including data sources and handling of personal data.
    • Risk mitigation, safety measures, and potential harms (bias, discrimination, safety hazards).
    • Governance and accountability structures (internal review processes, independent audits, third-party testing).
    • Compliance with existing state and federal laws, and a point of contact for the Attorney General.
  • Compliance procedures: The bill would establish filing, reporting, or periodic updating requirements, along with deadlines and submission formats. It may also authorize the Attorney General to request additional information as needed.
  • Enforcement and penalties: The act would typically authorize enforcement mechanisms, potential penalties for non-compliance, and remedies available to the state, which could include civil penalties or corrective actions.

Who would be affected

  • Primary: AI developers and companies that create or deploy AI systems that fall under the bill’s definitions of “certain AI developers.”
  • Secondary: Users and consumers in New Jersey who rely on AI-enabled products and services, as disclosure requirements advance greater transparency and regulatory oversight.
  • Government: The New Jersey Attorney General’s office would receive disclosures and may use the information to monitor compliance, assess risks, and pursue enforcement if needed.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction: The bill was introduced and referred to the Assembly Science, Innovation and Technology Committee.
  • Next steps (typical for committee process):
    • Committee hearings and potential amendments.
    • Vote in committee to advance to the full Assembly.
    • Potential floor votes, reconciliations, and eventual passage by both legislative chambers (if advanced).
    • Enactment would depend on passage by both houses and signing by the Governor, with any effective dates specified in the bill.

Potential impact

  • Increased transparency: Requires AI developers to reveal information to the state, aiding oversight and public accountability.
  • Regulatory framework: Establishes a state-level disclosure regime that complements existing privacy and consumer protection laws.
  • Compliance burden: Firms developing AI may need to allocate resources for reporting, documentation, and governance measures.
  • Public safety and fairness: Disclosures aim to help assess and mitigate risks associated with AI systems, including bias, safety concerns, and data practices.

Note: The summary reflects the bill’s stated title and available action history. For precise language, definitions, exact disclosure items, thresholds for applicability, and enforcement details, please consult the bill’s official text as amended in committee and on the New Jersey Legislature’s website.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.