WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 2471

REQUIRED ETHICS TRAINING

104th Regular Session Introduced by Paul Jacobs and 1 co-sponsor

Requires annual harassment and discrimination prevention training for state officials and employees, with reciprocity to other state training and centralized oversight.

Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Tony M. McCombie
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 2471

HB 2471 — Required Ethics Training (Summary)

Status/Source
- Jurisdiction: Illinois (104th General Assembly). Bill introduced 2/4/2025 by Rep. Paul Jacobs (LRB10409507JRC19570b).
- Statutory target: Amends the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act — 5 ILCS 430/5‑10.5 (harassment and discrimination prevention training).
- Legislative actions (as provided): filed/first reading 2/4/2025; referred to Rules Committee; read first time 3/17/2025; referred to Land & Resource Management (note: provided actions appear mixed). The bill text provided appears to be the Illinois draft; an unrelated Arizona election statute excerpt is also included in the materials (see “Note” below).

Purpose and intent
- To clarify and expand the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act training requirements so that completion of the required State ethics harassment and discrimination prevention training is recognized as satisfying similar harassment/discrimination prevention training obligations that may be required by Illinois employers or for licensure by the State (including training required under the Illinois Human Rights Act).

Key provisions
- Annual training requirement: Requires each officer, member, and employee covered by the Act to complete, at least annually, a harassment and discrimination prevention training program (the text integrates and replaces earlier sexual harassment-only language).
- Initial training deadline: A person filling a vacancy in an elective or appointed position must complete initial training within 30 days of starting office or employment.
- Minimum training content (must include at least):
- Definitions and descriptions of sexual harassment, unlawful discrimination, and harassment, with examples.
- How to report allegations (including confidential reporting options to a supervisor, ethics officer, Inspector General, or the Department of Human Rights).
- Definition/description of retaliation and availability of whistleblower protections (Whistleblower Act, Illinois Human Rights Act).
- Consequences for violations and for knowingly making false reports.
- Oversight: Training programs are to be overseen by the appropriate Ethics Commission and State Inspector General.
- Proof/reciprocity: Any person who successfully completes the training required under this Act is considered to have successfully completed similar harassment/discrimination prevention training that may be required for Illinois employment or state licensure — explicitly including training required by the Illinois Human Rights Act.
- Reporting by jurisdictions: Each “ultimate jurisdictional authority” must submit at least annual reports to its Ethics Commission summarizing training completed, plans for upcoming training, and names of individuals who failed to complete required training. Ethics Commissions must make those reports available on their websites.

Who would be affected
- State officers, appointed members, and employees subject to the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act.
- Local jurisdictions and agencies that oversee training for covered officials and staff (responsible for reporting to Ethics Commissions).
- Employers, licensing boards, and individuals applying for state licenses — because successful completion under this Act is treated as satisfying comparable state-required harassment/discrimination training (potentially reducing duplicate training).

Implementation and impact
- Streamlines compliance by creating reciprocity between State ethics training and other statutory training obligations (e.g., Illinois Human Rights Act).
- Standardizes minimum training content and centralizes oversight and reporting through Ethics Commissions and the Inspector General.
- May reduce duplication of training for individuals who hold public office or positions requiring licensure.
- Enforcement/administration details (scheduling, formats, penalties for noncompliance) would be shaped by implementing guidance from Ethics Commissions and the Inspector General.

Note on provided materials
- The packet you supplied also includes a lengthy, unrelated Arizona bill text concerning election precincts, voting centers, and emergency voting (Arizona A.R.S. §16‑411 excerpts). That election-related text does not appear to be part of the Illinois HB 2471 ethics/training amendment and may have been included in error. This summary focuses on the Illinois ethics/training provisions (5 ILCS 430/5‑10.5) as reflected in the LRB bill text.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.