WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

LB 612

Require the state to pay fifty percent of the operational costs of county courts

109th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Bob Andersen

The state would pay 50% of specified county court operational costs, shifting funding to the Supreme Court while counties retain non-covered expenses and asset ownership.

Title printed. Carryover bill
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · LB 612

Summary of LB 612 (Nebraska, 2025)

Overview

  • Bill Number: LB 612
  • Title: Require the state to pay fifty percent of the operational costs of county courts
  • Introduced: January 22, 2025
  • Primary Sponsor: Senator Bob Andersen; Co-sponsor: Senator Clouse
  • Committee: Judiciary
  • Status: Notice of hearing scheduled for February 13, 2025
  • Intent: Amend section 24-514 to require the State to cover 50% of certain county court operational costs, and repeal the current version of the section.

What LB 612 Would Do

  • The State of Nebraska would be required to pay half of specified county court operational costs, funded through appropriations to the Nebraska Supreme Court.
  • The bill retains the state’s responsibility for salaries, benefits, and travel/education expenses of county court judges and employees, and expands state funding to include 50% of enumerated operational costs.
  • The county would continue to pay expenses not specifically covered by the statute.
  • The bill repeals the existing text of section 24-514 and replaces it with the new cost-sharing framework.

Key Provisions (Section 1)

LB 612 amends Section 24-514 to read:
1) The State shall pay, with funds appropriated to the Supreme Court:
- All salaries, benefits, and travel/education expenses for county court judges and employees.
- Fifty percent of the following county court operational costs:
- (1) Computer hardware and software used for data processing;
- (2) Computer hardware and software used for word processing if the costs are incurred on state-owned equipment;
- (3) Communication line costs arising from data and word processing related to (1) and (2);
- (4) Multi-track recorders, microphones, and playback units used to create verbatim records of county court proceedings.
2) The county shall pay any county court expense not provided for in this section.
Notes:
- All property purchased by the county as a county court expense before September 9, 1993, or on/after September 9, 1993, remains the property of the county.

Affected Parties

  • County courts and county governments (cost-sharing for specified operational items)
  • Nebraska Supreme Court (administrative funding source for the shared costs)
  • County judges and county court staff (continuing salary/benefits/education/travel funding)
  • General public through potential budgetary implications of state funding for court operations

Procedural and Timeline Details

  • Introduced: January 22, 2025
  • Referred to: Judiciary Committee (January 24, 2025)
  • Hearing: Notice of hearing set for February 13, 2025
  • Legislative actions include: introduction, committee referral, and scheduled hearing

Fiscal and Policy Implications

  • Shifts a portion of county court operational costs to state funding (50% of the enumerated items).
  • Requires new or adjusted appropriations to the Supreme Court to cover these costs.
  • Creates a defined cost-sharing framework, potentially reducing county financial burden for certain technological and recording expenses.
  • Keeps counties responsible for expenses not covered by the statute and preserves county ownership of pre-/post-1993 property purchases.

Considerations for Stakeholders

  • How will the required appropriations for the Supreme Court be estimated and allocated?
  • Which counties may experience greater relief or ongoing costs under this 50% share?
  • Interaction with existing county budgets and long-term technology planning for county courts
  • Administrative details of implementing the new cost-sharing arrangement

This summary presents LB 612’s core aim: to federalize/centralize half of specific county court operational costs through state funding, while preserving county ownership of certain assets and duties for non-covered expenses.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.