WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 723

repealing the multi-use energy data platform.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Lex Berezhny and 5 co-sponsors

The bill repeals the Multi-Use Energy Data Platform, ending its authority, funding, data programs, and related governance.

Signed by Governor Ayotte 04/22/2026; Chapter 28; eff. 06/21/2026
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 723

Summary of Bill HB 723 (Session 2026, New Hampshire)

Title: Repealing the Multi-Use Energy Data Platform

This summary provides a clear overview of the bill’s purpose, key provisions, affected parties, and timeline/process details based on the available legislative history.

1) Purpose and Intent

  • The bill aims to repeal the Multi-Use Energy Data Platform (MEaDP) in New Hampshire.
  • In short, it would terminate or remove legal/operational frameworks, funding, and requirements associated with the energy data platform.

2) Key Provisions and Changes

Since the enacted text is not provided here, the summary focuses on the high-level action implied by “repealing the multi-use energy data platform.” Based on typical legislative language, expected elements may include:
- Abolishment of statutory authority creating MEaDP.
- Repeal of statutory mandates for data collection, sharing, or reporting that were tied to MEaDP.
- Termination of ongoing programs, contracts, or partnerships specifically tied to MEaDP.
- Disposition of existing data and records: procedures for archiving, transferring to other agencies, or decommissioning data systems.
- Possible sunset or phase-out timeline to wind down MEaDP operations.
- Reallocation or re-purposing of funds previously dedicated to MEaDP.

Note: The exact text would specify which sections of law are repealed, any transitional provisions, and how ongoing data access or public reporting is affected.

3) Who/What Is Affected

  • State agencies and offices that administered or relied on MEaDP.
  • Agencies involved in energy policy, planning, regulation, or data management (potentially Public Utilities Commission, Department of Environmental Services, Department of Administrative Services, etc.).
  • Data providers and users of energy data (industries, researchers, policymakers, and the general public) who relied on MEaDP for aggregated or modeled data.
  • Contractors or vendors engaged in MEaDP development or maintenance (as applicable).
  • The repeal may affect public energy data availability, dashboards, or analytics previously accessible via MEaDP.

4) Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction and Referral: The bill was introduced in 2025 and referred to relevant committees (Science, Technology and Energy; later Energy and Natural Resources, Finance steps are indicated in the history).
  • Committee Process:
    • Series of committee hearings and votes from 2025 into 2026.
    • Multiple “Ought to Pass” recommendations (indicating favorable committee reports in various stages).
    • Amendments were considered (e.g., Amendment #2026-0549e) during recess sessions in early 2026.
  • Floor Action and Enactment:
    • The bill progressed through committee reports, executive sessions, and amendments.
    • Enrolled and adopted versions appear in April 2026, indicating passage by the legislature in some form (final enrolled statuses show 04/16/2026).
  • Status: The bill shows an enacted/enrolled status as of 04/16/2026, with the title indicating repeal of the MEaDP. This suggests final passage and approval, subject to any gubernatorial action (not specified here).

5) Potential Impacts and Considerations

  • Public Access to Energy Data: Repeal may reduce centralized public access to energy data previously provided by MEaDP; replacements or alternative data sources may be needed.
  • Data Management: Agencies will need to plan decommissioning of the platform, including data retention, archiving, and transition of responsibilities.
  • Fiscal Implications: Repeal may free up funds previously allocated to MEaDP or reallocate them to other programs; costs associated with decommissioning and potential data migration should be considered.
  • Policy Continuity: Any energy planning activities that depended on MEaDP data could require alternative data streams or updated governance.

If you would like, I can tailor this summary to include specific statutory sections to be repealed, projected transition timelines, or a comparison of MEaDP’s prior services with the post-repeal landscape, once the bill’s text is available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.