WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 1458

Removes the requirement that rent arrears be repaid for social services districts located in a municipality with a population of five million or more

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Brian Kavanagh

Exempts zoos, certain research institutions, and horse/cattle auctions from Section 39A animal health inspections, shifting oversight to other regulatory frameworks.

REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCE
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 1458

Summary — S.1458 (Senate Docket No. 1017) — “An Act relative to updating animal health inspections”

Bill at a glance

  • Bill number: S 1458 (Senate Docket No. 1017)
  • Short title (from filed text): An Act relative to updating animal health inspections
  • Filed/Presented: 1/15/2025 (presented by Sen. Mark C. Montigny)
  • Current status (per provided actions): Reported and committed to Finance (PRINT 1458A; amendments and committee actions noted)
  • Note on discrepancies: The cover/title line supplied with your request (about removing a rent‑arrears repayment requirement) does not match the actual bill text included. The official text attached to this docket concerns animal health inspections in Massachusetts. This summary follows the bill text provided.

Purpose / intent

The bill narrows the scope of applicability for Section 39A of chapter 129 of the Massachusetts General Laws (a statutory provision governing animal health inspections) by explicitly excluding certain types of facilities/activities. The likely intent is to clarify that these specialized entities are governed under other regulatory regimes and therefore are not subject to the requirements of Section 39A.

Key provision (text change)

  • Amends Section 39A of chapter 129 by replacing the second paragraph with the following sentence:
    • "This section shall not apply to a publicly or privately owned zoological park, a research institution as defined in section 136A of chapter 140, or to horse or cattle auctions."

In short: publicly or privately owned zoos, research institutions (as defined in ch. 140, §136A), and horse or cattle auctions are exempted from the requirements of Section 39A.

Who/what would be affected

  • Directly affected:
    • Zoological parks (public and private)
    • Research institutions that fall under the definition in chapter 140, §136A (e.g., certain laboratories or institutional animal research facilities)
    • Horse and cattle auctions
  • Indirectly affected:
    • Municipal animal control and public health agencies that currently rely on Section 39A authority for inspections or enforcement with respect to those entities
    • State agencies responsible for animal health or agricultural regulation (e.g., Department of Agricultural Resources)
    • Animal welfare advocates and operators of the listed facilities, who may see a change in inspection/oversight regime
  • Likely consequence: oversight of the excluded entities would instead be governed by the other, existing statutes/regulatory frameworks that apply to zoos, research institutions, and livestock auctions (federal and state regulations), reducing overlap with Section 39A.

Procedural / timeline highlights (from provided actions)

  • Filed/presented: 1/15/2025 (Senate Docket No. 1017 / S.1458)
  • Referred to committees: Social Services; Municipalities and Regional Government (dates in record vary)
  • Public hearing scheduled: 06/10/2025 (1:00–5:00 PM, B‑1)
  • Amendments and re‑referrals: AMEND (T) and recommit to Social Services; PRINT 1458A issued (5/14/2025)
  • Reported and committed to Finance: 05/20/2025 (listed twice)
  • Committee report favorable and referred to Senate Ways & Means: 11/19/2025 (per provided timeline)

Because the provided action timeline contains overlapping and out‑of‑order dates, consult the official Massachusetts legislative website or the Senate clerk for the authoritative, current status.

Notes, context, and potential impacts

  • Rationale: The exemption language suggests legislators want to avoid duplication of inspection regimes where other specialized statutes/regulations already provide oversight (e.g., USDA, state agricultural law, research‑facility regulations).
  • Potential effect on oversight: If Section 39A previously imposed inspection, reporting, or licensing requirements for these entities, the change could reduce municipal/state inspection authority under that section—transferring reliance to the alternative regulatory frameworks referenced.
  • Stakeholders to watch: zoo operators, academic and private research institutions, livestock auction operators, municipal animal control, state agricultural/animal health agencies, and animal welfare organizations.
  • Recommendation: Review the full current text of Chapter 129, §39A and Chapter 140, §136A to determine precisely what requirements Section 39A imposes now and what regulatory definitions apply to research institutions. Also verify the bill’s enacted text and any implementing regulations or guidance if the bill advances.

If you want, I can: (a) locate and summarize the current language of chapter 129, §39A and chapter 140, §136A; (b) map the practical inspection/oversight differences that would follow from this amendment; or (c) prepare a briefing for stakeholders (zoos, research institutions, auctions).

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.