WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 6375

Removes the requirement that consent for the payment of certain medical services must occur after such services are administered

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Robert Jackson and 1 co-sponsor

Eliminates the post-service timing rule for payment consent on certain medical services, letting consent occur before or during care—changing billing, workflows, and protections.

PRINT NUMBER 6375C
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 6375

Summary — S.6375 (Rivera) — Removes post-service timing requirement for consent to payment of certain medical services

Status: COMMITTED TO RULES (Senate)
Introduced: March 12, 2025
Sponsor: Sen. Gustavo Rivera
Companion bill: A.6773 (Assembly)

Purpose / Intent

S.6375 would eliminate a statutory requirement that consent to the payment of certain medical services be obtained after those services are administered. In other words, where current law specifies that patient (or responsible party) consent for payment must occur after care has been delivered, this bill removes that timing requirement. The stated intent (based on the bill title and legislative history) is to change the legal timing requirement for when consent to payment must be obtained.

Key provision(s)

  • Deletes or amends the statutory phrase(s) that require consent for payment to be obtained only after medical services have been provided.
  • The bill as described does not, in the provided materials, specify alternative mandatory timing, forms, or additional procedural safeguards; it simply removes the post-service timing requirement.

(Note: The full bill text was not included in the materials supplied; the precise statutory sections modified and any accompanying definitions or replacement language should be reviewed in the official bill text for exact wording.)

Who would be affected

  • Patients and their authorized representatives — changes the timing (and potentially the context) in which they may be asked to consent to payment arrangements.
  • Health care providers and facilities — may alter intake, consent, and billing workflows if providers can obtain consent at times other than after services are rendered.
  • Payers (insurers, Medicaid/Medicare where applicable), third‑party billing agents, and collections entities — could face changes in billing authorization documentation and dispute procedures.
  • Regulators and enforcement bodies — may need to interpret, issue guidance, or adopt implementing rules if the statute leaves timing and safeguards undefined.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Administrative: providers may revise consent forms and timing of financial discussions; training and operational changes may be required.
  • Consumer protection: removal of a post-service timing requirement could raise concerns about informed consent, coercion, or patient understanding of financial obligations unless other protections are added.
  • Legal and payment disputes: the change could affect when and how payment obligations are established and contested.
  • Implementation may require regulatory guidance to clarify acceptable timing, documentation standards, and safeguards.

Legislative history / next steps

  • 2025-03-12: Referred to Health (Senate)
  • 2025-05-13: Printed as S.6375A; amended and recommitted to Health
  • 2025-05-20 / 05-21: Reported to Calendar (Cal.1267)
  • 2025-05-22: Advanced to Third Reading
  • 2025-06-09: Amended on Third Reading (T) — S.6375B
  • 2025-06-13: Committed to Rules (current status)

For exact statutory changes, language, and affected code sections, consult the official bill text (S.6375A / S.6375B) and the companion Assembly bill A.6773.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.