WeVote

Bill

Bill

A 11088

Removes the deadly weapon or dangerous instrument requirement from aggravated assault upon a police officer or peace officer

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Joe Angelino and 8 co-sponsors

Broadens aggravated assault on police by removing the requirement that injury come from a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument, focusing on intent to cause serious injury.

REFERRED TO CODES
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 11088

Overview

Bill A.11088 (2025-2026, New York) seeks to remove the requirement that aggravated assault upon a police officer or peace officer be committed with a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument. The bill preserves the offense of aggravated assault but changes the means element so that injuring an officer in the course of duty without using a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument would still satisfy the crime, provided the offender acts with intent to cause serious physical injury.

Purpose and intent

  • To broaden the circumstances under which aggravated assault on a police or peace officer can be charged, by removing the explicit element that the injury be caused by a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument.
  • Align the offense with a focus on the offender’s intent to cause serious physical injury, regardless of the specific instrument used.

Key provisions

  • Section 120.11 (Aggravated assault upon a police officer or a peace officer) is amended.
  • Current standard (as reflected in the bill’s language) requires:
    • The offender to cause serious physical injury to a person known or reasonably believed to be a police or peace officer, while the officer is performing duties, and
    • The injury must be caused by a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument.
  • The proposed standard (after amendment) would remove the requirement that the injury be caused by a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument. The essential elements would be:
    • Intention to cause serious physical injury
    • Target is a police officer or peace officer engaged in official duties
    • Injury caused by any means (not limited to a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument)
  • Classification: The offense remains a Class B felony.

Who/what is affected

  • Potential defendants who injure police or peace officers while those officers are performing official duties, where the injury is not caused by a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument, could be charged with aggravated assault under the revised standard.
  • Police officers and peace officers (as the protected class) would remain the victims protected by this statute.
  • Prosecutors: would gain a broader charging basis for aggravated assault where serious injury is intended and inflicted by non-weapon means.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Effective date: Immediate upon enactment.
  • The bill was introduced by Assembly Member E. Brown and referred to the Codes Committee on April 24, 2026.
  • The bill includes standard legislative formatting and an explanatory note indicating new material (italics/underscoring) and removed language (brackets).

Potential implications

  • Policy impact: Broadens the reach of aggravated assault charges in cases involving injuries to officers when no deadly weapon or dangerous instrument is used.
  • Sentencing: Keeps the offense as a Class B felony, which carries significant penalties, but the removal of the weapon/dangerous instrument element could affect case strategy, charging decisions, and potential plea negotiations.
  • Law enforcement implications: May increase accountability where serious injury results from actions lacking a weapon or instrument, potentially affecting officer safety dynamics and prosecutorial charging discretion.

If you’d like, I can compare this bill to the current statute and outline hypothetical scenarios illustrating how charges would differ before and after enactment.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.