WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 3091

Removes obsolete administrative entities in various state departments

2026 Regular Session

HB 3091 removes obsolete state entities and reallocates their duties to existing departments to streamline government and reduce redundancy.

Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 3091

Summary of HB 3091 (2026) – Missouri

Purpose and intent

HB 3091 seeks to remove obsolete administrative entities and structures within various state departments. The bill’s overarching goal is to streamline government operations by eliminating entities that no longer serve a current administrative or regulatory function, thereby reducing redundancy and potential overhead across state agencies.

Key provisions and changes

  • Elimination of obsolete entities: The bill targets specific administrative units, boards, commissions, advisory councils, or other subdivisions that are deemed obsolete or no longer operational within state departments.
  • Redirection of duties: In places where responsibilities of removed entities are still necessary, the bill provides for the reallocation or consolidation of those duties to existing departments, divisions, or staff to maintain continuity of governance and service delivery.
  • Codification and cross-references: Revisions will be made to statutes to reflect the removal of these entities and to update cross-references, ensuring no unresolved or conflicting statutory language remains.
  • Administrative housekeeping: The measure emphasizes cleanup of outdated statutory language and departmental organizational charts to better reflect current government structure.

Note: The specific entities targeted for removal, the precise statutory amendments, and any transitional provisions are detail-oriented and may be enumerated in the bill’s text and accompanying fiscal/impact statements.

Who/what is affected

  • State agencies and departments: Internal organizational frameworks will be affected where obsolete entities are removed, potentially changing lines of authority or reporting structures within departments.
  • Public administration and staff: Where duties are redistributed, relevant staff and units may take on additional responsibilities or absorb functions previously handled by eliminated entities.
  • General public and regulated parties: If the abolished entities performed regulatory or advisory functions, those regulatory responsibilities or guidance may be continued through other channels, ensuring ongoing protections and information for stakeholders.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Committee referral: Referred to Emerging Issues (H) on May 15, 2026, indicating initial consideration in a House committee focused on systems and governance topics.
  • Floor action history:
    • Introduced and read First Time in the House on January 22, 2026.
    • Read Second Time in the House on January 27, 2026.
  • The bill’s progress beyond the House (e.g., passage, Senate referral, signature) is not included in the provided history and would depend on subsequent legislative steps, committee action, and votes.

Potential implications

  • Governance efficiency: By removing obsolete entities, state government may reduce administrative bloat and simplify oversight.
  • Transitional considerations: Clear guidance on how duties transition from eliminated bodies will be crucial to avoid gaps in program administration or regulatory authority.
  • Legal clarity: Updating statutes to remove obsolete references can reduce confusion for practitioners, public employees, and the public.

If available, consulting the bill’s full text and any fiscal notes or impact statements would provide precise details on which entities are targeted and how specific functions are redistributed.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.