WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 166

Relating to tuition and fee exemptions at public institutions of higher education for certain students who were under the conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective Services.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by José Menéndez

Exempts former foster youth under DFPS conservatorship from tuition and fees at Texas public colleges, removing financial barriers to higher education access.

Referred to Education K-16
#education--higher--admission&attendance(i0257) #education--higher--studentfees(i0234) #education--higher--studentfinancialaid(i0235) #education--higher--tuition(i0233) #family&protectiveservices #departmentof(v0461) #family--childprotection(i0351) #health&humanservicescommission(v0177) #highereducationcoordinatingboard #texas(v4280)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 166

Legislative bill overview

SB 166 would exempt certain students from tuition and fee payments at Texas public higher education institutions if they were previously under the conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS). The bill targets former foster youth and similar vulnerable populations who aged out of state care, addressing barriers to educational access for this specific group.

Why is this important

Former foster youth face significant obstacles to higher education, including financial barriers and lack of family support systems. Tuition exemptions could increase college enrollment and completion rates for a population with historically lower educational attainment, while potentially reducing long-term social costs associated with limited economic opportunity.

Potential points of contention

  • Fiscal impact: The bill's cost depends on how many eligible students exist and their enrollment patterns; institutions may face budget pressures or need state funding increases to offset lost tuition revenue
  • Eligibility scope: Questions about how to verify conservatorship history, determine which time periods qualify, and whether the exemption applies to all fees or only tuition could affect implementation
  • Equity concerns: Some may argue similar exemptions should apply to other disadvantaged groups (homeless youth, low-income students, etc.), raising questions about whether this targets the right population or if broader support is needed

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.