WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 936

Relating to the withdrawal or revocation of an athletic scholarship by a public institution of higher education on the basis of a student athlete's injury, illness, or disability.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Jo Jones and 1 co-sponsor

Texas bill prohibits public universities from canceling athletic scholarships due to student-athlete injury, illness, or disability, ensuring continued funding during medical treatment.

Referred to Higher Education
#amusements #games #sports(i0034) #education--higher--athletics(i0256) #education--higher--studentfinancialaid(i0235) #highereducationcoordinatingboard #texas(v4280) #scholarships(s2123)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 936

Legislative bill overview

HB 936 would prohibit public universities in Texas from withdrawing or revoking athletic scholarships solely because a student-athlete sustains an injury, illness, or disability. The bill establishes protections requiring institutions to maintain scholarship funding for affected athletes, at least through the duration of their medical recovery or treatment period.

Why is this important

Athletic scholarships represent substantial financial commitments that enable many students to attend college. Without such protections, injured or ill athletes face potential loss of educational funding during vulnerable periods when medical needs may prevent competition, creating financial hardship and educational disruption. This bill addresses a gap where current law may not adequately protect student-athletes' educational access.

Potential points of contention

  • Athletic program budgeting: Universities may argue that scholarship flexibility is necessary for competitive recruitment and roster management, and mandatory funding restrictions could strain athletic department budgets
  • Definition and scope: Unclear what constitutes covered "injury, illness, or disability" and whether temporary conditions receive the same protections as permanent ones, potentially creating disputes over applicability
  • Institutional autonomy: Questions about whether state mandates should dictate how universities manage internal scholarship decisions and athletic program operations
  • Long-term financial liability: Institutions may face extended funding obligations for permanently disabled athletes, raising concerns about perpetual financial commitments beyond typical scholarship periods

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.