WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 3360

Relating to the protection and detention of a juvenile who engages in delinquent conduct or commits a felony offense while committed to the custody of the Texas Juvenile Justice Department; changing the eligibility for community supervision; redefining habitual felony conduct.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Mitch Little and 3 co-sponsors

HB 3360 tightens Texas juvenile detention policies by restricting community supervision eligibility and redefining habitual felony conduct, potentially increasing institutional confinement for repeat offenders.

Left pending in subcommittee
#corrections--parole #probation&pardons(i0093) #crimes--juvenile(i0190) #family--juveniledelinquency(i0360) #juvenilejusticedepartment #texas(v0846) #mandatory&communitysupervision(s2314)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 3360

Legislative bill overview

HB 3360 modifies Texas juvenile justice policies regarding detention and supervision of youth in the state's juvenile justice system. The bill changes eligibility criteria for community supervision and redefines what constitutes habitual felony conduct for juveniles, potentially affecting how repeat offenders are handled and where they are housed.

Why is this important

These changes directly impact how Texas detention facilities manage youth offenders and determine whether juveniles receive community-based rehabilitation or institutional confinement. The redefinition of habitual felony conduct could significantly alter sentencing and placement outcomes for repeat juvenile offenders, affecting both public safety measures and rehabilitation opportunities.

Potential points of contention

  • Detention vs. rehabilitation philosophy: Stricter definitions of habitual conduct may increase institutional detention, raising concerns about whether the system prioritizes punishment over rehabilitation for youth
  • Community supervision access: Changes to eligibility could narrow which juveniles qualify for less restrictive community-based programs, potentially limiting reentry opportunities
  • Racial and socioeconomic disparities: Juvenile justice policies historically show differential application across demographic groups; these changes warrant scrutiny for equitable implementation

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.