WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 3322

Relating to the procedure for amending or revoking certificates of public convenience and necessity issued to certain water utilities.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Cody Harris

HB 3322 modifies Texas procedures for amending or revoking water utility operating certificates, affecting regulatory flexibility and utility operational stability.

Left pending in committee
#federalrelations(s0862) #loans(s0117) #publicutilitycommission(v0023) #utilities--water&sewer(i0002)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 3322

Legislative bill overview

HB 3322 modifies the procedural requirements for amending or revoking certificates of public convenience and necessity (CCN) that are issued to certain water utilities in Texas. The bill appears to streamline or alter how the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) or relevant authorities can modify these regulatory authorizations that allow utilities to operate.

Why is this important

Certificates of public convenience and necessity are essential regulatory tools that control water utility service territories and ensure service quality. Changes to amendment and revocation procedures directly affect a utility's operational flexibility, a community's water service reliability, and the regulatory burden on both utilities and oversight agencies.

Potential points of contention

  • Utility vs. public interest balance: Easier amendment/revocation procedures could pressure utilities financially and disrupt service, while stricter procedures might protect utilities from arbitrary regulatory action at the expense of public oversight
  • Procedural fairness concerns: The specific procedural changes could affect notice requirements, hearing opportunities, or evidence standards that determine how utilities and affected parties participate in these decisions
  • Scope limitations: The bill's reference to "certain water utilities" suggests selective application; stakeholders may dispute which utilities are covered and whether differential treatment is justified

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.