WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 2176

Relating to the establishment of the Texas Cyber Command as a component institution of The University of Texas System and the transfer to it of certain powers and duties of the Department of Information Resources.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Tan Parker

Bill transfers Texas cybersecurity operations from state agency DIR to new UT System institution, restructuring governance of state cyber infrastructure.

Referred to Business & Commerce
#education--higher--institutions&programs(i0223) #electronicinformationsystems(i0311) #governor(i0375) #informationresources #departmentof(v9827) #lawenforcement(i0510) #senate #texas(v0227) #science&technology(i0751) #stateagencies #boards&commissions(i0749) #universityoftexasatsanantonio(u0001) #universityoftexassystem(u0045)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 2176

Legislative bill overview

SB 2176 proposes establishing the Texas Cyber Command as a formal component institution within The University of Texas System and transferring certain cybersecurity responsibilities from the Department of Information Resources (DIR) to this new entity. The bill would give UT System oversight of what is currently a state agency function, restructuring how Texas manages its cybersecurity infrastructure and operations.

Why is this important

Cybersecurity is critical infrastructure in the digital age—breaches of state systems can compromise citizen data, disrupt services, and cost taxpayers millions. This reorganization would place cybersecurity governance under an academic institution rather than a traditional government agency, which could affect how cybersecurity decisions are made, funded, and aligned with both higher education and state government priorities.

Potential points of contention

  • Institutional fit: Questions about whether a university system is the appropriate home for state-level cybersecurity operations, which typically require 24/7 government accountability and emergency response capabilities
  • Duplication and coordination: Uncertainty about how DIR's remaining cybersecurity functions would operate alongside the new UT-based entity, potentially creating gaps or overlapping jurisdictions
  • Funding and independence: Concerns about whether UT System budgeting and administrative constraints would adequately resource critical state cybersecurity needs or whether universities should be responsible for protecting sensitive government infrastructure

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.