WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 2828

Relating to the creation and operation of a science park district in certain counties that may impose assessments, fees, and taxes.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Tan Parker

SB 2828 enables Texas counties to create science park districts with power to tax and assess properties to fund research and innovation infrastructure development.

Referred to Economic Development
#audits&auditors(s4334) #bonds(s6060) #economicdevelopment&tourismoffice #texas(v1109) #economic&industrialdevelopment--general(i0214) #elections--general(i0310) #elections--initiative #referendum&recall(i0300) #governor(i0375) #lieutenantgovernor(s0096) #openmeetings(i0546) #propertyinterests--realproperty(i0595) #reinvestmentzones(s0342) #research&development(s0135) #speakerofthehouse(s0306) #science&technology(i0751) #specialdistricts&authorities--miscellaneous(i0770) #taxation--property-taxrate(i0794)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 2828

Legislative bill overview

SB 2828 would authorize the creation of science park districts in specified Texas counties with the power to levy assessments, fees, and taxes to fund operations. These districts would be governed entities designed to develop and manage science and technology park infrastructure and programs that attract research institutions and innovation-based businesses.

Why is this important

Science parks can drive regional economic development by clustering research facilities, universities, and tech companies, potentially creating high-wage jobs and attracting talent. However, the bill grants new taxing authority to unelected or semi-elected district boards, which directly affects property owners and businesses in those counties through mandatory financial obligations.

Potential points of contention

  • Taxing authority scope: The bill grants broad power to impose assessments, fees, and taxes without clear limits on rates or total burden, raising concerns about unchecked financial obligations on property owners
  • Governance structure: Details about district board composition, election procedures, and accountability mechanisms are unclear from the bill description, which may allow limited public control over spending decisions
  • Geographic specificity: The restriction to "certain counties" suggests some regions benefit while others don't, potentially creating unequal economic development incentives across the state

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.