WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 1628

Relating to the consideration of criminal history record information of applicants for public employment or an occupational license.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Borris Miles

SB 1628 restricts how Texas public employers and licensing agencies can disqualify job applicants based on criminal history, balancing workforce reentry against public safety concerns.

Referred to Business & Commerce
#audits&auditors(s4334) #criminalrecords(s0008) #citygovernment--employees/officers(i0061) #countygovernment--employees/officers(i0095) #grievanceprocedures(s0121) #labor--general(i0500) #politicalsubdivisions(i0588) #stateagencies #boards&commissions(i0749) #workforcecommission #texas(v0470)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1628

Legislative bill overview

SB 1628 regulates how criminal history records can be considered when evaluating applicants for public employment or occupational licenses in Texas. The bill establishes parameters for when and how employers and licensing agencies can use prior criminal convictions in their decision-making processes.

Why is this important

Criminal background screening significantly affects job prospects and economic opportunity for formerly incarcerated individuals. The bill addresses tension between public safety concerns and workforce reintegration by potentially limiting blanket disqualifications based on criminal history, which could expand employment opportunities while allowing agencies to maintain legitimate safety standards.

Potential points of contention

  • Scope of criminal history exclusions: Determining which offenses should automatically disqualify applicants versus allowing case-by-case evaluation may conflict between public safety advocates and criminal justice reform supporters
  • Burden on employers/agencies: Implementing individualized assessment requirements could increase administrative costs and legal liability for public entities making hiring decisions
  • Public safety vs. rehabilitation philosophy: Disagreement over whether prior convictions should presumptively disqualify people from certain positions (particularly law enforcement, education, healthcare) versus giving redemption priority

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.