Relating to substance abuse prevention; declaring an emergency.
Creates a PFAS Fund funded by a new manufacturer tax to grant/reimburse public entities for PFAS testing, cleanup, and related costs.
Creates a PFAS Fund funded by a new manufacturer tax to grant/reimburse public entities for PFAS testing, cleanup, and related costs.
Status & Sponsorship
- Primary sponsor: Rep. Abdelnasser Rashid.
- Introduced: Feb 2025. Current status (as provided): Rule 19(a) / Re‑referred to Rules Committee.
- Companion: SB 1746.
Purpose
- To create a permanent funding mechanism to address PFAS contamination by (1) imposing a tax on PFAS manufacturers and (2) establishing a dedicated PFAS Fund to provide grants and reimbursements to eligible public entities for PFAS‑related costs. The Act aims to protect public health and natural resources while shifting remediation costs toward manufacturers.
Key provisions
1. PFAS Fund (special state fund)
- Creates the PFAS Fund in the State treasury.
- Sources: settlements from Attorney General enforcement actions, tax revenues collected under the Act, and other credited moneys.
- Interest and investment income remain in the Fund; balances carry forward and do not revert to General Revenue.
- Fund may be divided into subaccounts (e.g., separate accounts for grant vs. reimbursement programs).
- Authorized uses include grants/reimbursements, Agency and Department administrative costs, and tax administration.
Administration
PFAS Grant Program & Reimbursement Program
PFAS tax on manufacturers
Definitions & scope
- The bill defines “PFAS chemical,” “PFAS manufacturer,” “PFAS‑related costs,” “eligible entity,” POTWs, etc., and adopts EPA‑aligned definitions for PFAS inclusion.
Potential impacts
- Public utilities/water systems: Creates a new funding source to finance PFAS testing, treatment, remediation, monitoring, and related capital projects — potentially reducing pressure on local ratepayers.
- PFAS manufacturers and product assemblers: New tax liability tied to specified PFAS chemicals; may increase costs, prompt reformulation or manufacturing changes.
- State agencies: Adds administrative responsibilities (Agency rulemaking, Department of Revenue tax administration, Pollution Control Board rule adoption).
- Legal/administrative: Establishes review pathways for program decisions; settlements and tax receipts provide multiple revenue streams but program details (eligibility, award amounts, specific taxed chemicals and rates) depend on forthcoming rulemaking.
Key procedural/timing notes
- Agency required to propose PFAS list and tax rates to Pollution Control Board; Board required to adopt rules no later than one year after the Agency’s proposal.
- Payments/grants contingent on Fund availability.
- The Act (as drafted in the introduced text) states it is effective immediately; many substantive details are left to Agency/Board rulemaking.
Uncertainties / items to watch
- Which specific PFAS compounds will be taxed and the tax rates (set via Agency/Board rulemaking).
- Exact eligibility criteria, reimbursement caps, and grant award methodologies to be set by the Agency.
- Interplay with other state or federal PFAS funding and regulatory programs.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.