WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 3142

Relating to school marshals, including eligibility for appointment as a school marshal, and licensure and training requirements.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Mark Dorazio and 10 co-sponsors

Texas bill adjusts school marshal eligibility, licensure, and training requirements, potentially expanding armed security personnel in schools.

Referred to Education K-16
#commissiononlawenforcement #texas(v1064) #education--juniorcollegedistricts(i0225) #education--primary&secondary--otherschoolpersonnel(i0246) #lawenforcement(i0510) #military&veterans(i0535) #occupationalregulation--othertrades&professions(i0541) #peaceofficers(s0007) #publicsafety #departmentof(v0251) #staffdevelopment&training(s0317) #volunteers(s1314) #weapons(i0887)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 3142

Legislative bill overview

HB 3142 modifies Texas requirements for school marshals—armed security personnel in schools—by adjusting eligibility criteria, licensure standards, and training requirements for individuals appointed to these positions. The bill has already passed initial legislative stages and is currently under review by the Education K-16 committee. Specific provisions are not detailed in the action history provided, but the bill's focus suggests changes to who can serve as a marshal and what qualifications they need.

Why is this important

School marshal programs directly affect campus safety policies and who has authority to carry firearms in K-12 schools. Changes to eligibility and training requirements can expand or restrict access to these positions, impacting school security infrastructure, hiring pools, and liability considerations across Texas districts. This is particularly significant given ongoing national debates about armed presence in schools and school safety strategies.

Potential points of contention

  • Lowered eligibility barriers: Relaxing requirements (such as prior law enforcement experience, background checks, or psychological evaluations) could expand the pool of eligible candidates but raise safety concerns among parents and educators.
  • Training standard adequacy: Reducing or modifying training mandates may lower costs and barriers to entry but could compromise preparedness for active threat situations and de-escalation scenarios.
  • Liability and accountability: Changes to licensure and oversight mechanisms may create questions about who bears responsibility if a marshal acts improperly or uses force in disputed circumstances.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.