Relating to public school accountability and transparency, including the implementation of an instructionally supportive assessment program and the adoption and administration of assessment instruments in public schools, indicators of achievement, public school performance ratings, and interventions and sanctions under the public school accountability system, a grant program for school district local accountability plans, and actions challenging Texas Education Agency decisions related to public school accountability.

89th Legislature, 2nd Called Session (2025) Introduced by Paul Bettencourt and 16 co-sponsors

Texas bill restructures school accountability through new assessment programs, revised performance ratings, and allows legal challenges to TEA accountability decisions affecting schools' funding and classifications.

Committee report printed and distributed

#academicperformance(s0134) #conservatorship(s0683) #educationagency #texas(v9941) #education #commissionerof(v9954) #stateboardof(v0086) #education--primary&secondary--accountability(i0007) #education--primary&secondary--charterschools(i0245) #education--primary&secondary--teachers(i0242) #education--primary&secondary--testing(i0229) #education--schooldistricts(i0220) #highereducationcoordinatingboard #texas(v4280) #internet(s0130) #labor--workforcedevelopment(i0495) #protectionofpersonalinformation(i0003) #workforcecommission #texas(v0470)

Legislative bill overview

SB 9 restructures Texas's public school accountability system by establishing a new "instructionally supportive assessment program" to replace or supplement existing testing frameworks, revising performance ratings for schools and districts, and modifying intervention/sanction procedures. The bill also creates a grant program for local accountability plans and allows legal challenges to Texas Education Agency (TEA) decisions on accountability matters.

Why is this important

Public school accountability systems directly affect school funding, educator evaluations, student placements, and parental school choices. Changes to assessment instruments and performance ratings reshape how 9+ million Texas students are evaluated and how schools are classified as successful or failing, with significant consequences for property values, school closures, and educator employment.

Potential points of contention

Testing philosophy debate: "Instructionally supportive assessment" is vaguely defined; stakeholders disagree whether this means fewer standardized tests, different test types, or expanded assessments, and whether reduced testing improves learning or obscures achievement gaps

Accountability standards ambiguity: Changing performance rating indicators without clear specifications could lower transparency or make comparisons across districts/years difficult, or conversely, might create inconsistent expectations

Legal challenge provisions: Allowing appeals of TEA accountability decisions could improve fairness or create litigation burden and inconsistency if standards for successful challenges remain undefined