WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 2943

Relating to public health testing; prescribing an effective date.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Farrah Chaichi and 4 co-sponsors

Arizona law would ban year-to-year reductions to municipal fire department operating budgets and allow withholding state-shared revenues to enforce restoration of any cut.

In committee upon adjournment.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 2943

HB 2943 — Summary (mixed-source document)

Note: The provided bill document contains text from two different sources/states. The primary enacted text included is an Arizona bill that would prohibit municipal reductions in fire department operating budgets and authorize the State Treasurer to withhold state-shared revenues to enforce that prohibition. The package also contains partial, unrelated language from an Illinois bill concerning executive and General Assembly pay provisions. This summary focuses on the Arizona municipal fire department provisions and explains the conflicting/extra material.

Purpose

To prevent municipalities (cities and towns) from reducing the annual operating budget for their municipal fire departments below the prior year’s level, and to create an enforcement mechanism by allowing the State Treasurer to withhold state-shared monies equal to any such reduction until the budget is restored.

Key provisions (Arizona portion)

  • Adds A.R.S. § 9-500.52 with four subsections:
    • (A) Prohibits a city or town from reducing the annual operating budget for a municipal fire department below the previous year’s budget.
    • (B) Requires a city or town that does reduce a fire department’s budget to notify the State Treasurer. Upon notification, the State Treasurer must withhold state-shared monies from that municipality in an amount equal to the budget reduction, pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-5029 and § 43-206. Withholding continues until the municipality notifies the Treasurer that the reduction has been restored.
    • (C) Exempts municipalities that do not have the monies required to maintain the prior-year budget (i.e., inability to pay).
    • (D) Defines “fire department” as a municipal fire department.
  • Amends A.R.S. § 42-5029 (transaction privilege and severance tax distribution statute) and A.R.S. § 43-206 (treasurer distribution authority) to provide the statutory bases for withholding state-shared funds as described above.

Who is affected

  • Municipalities (cities and towns) in Arizona — specifically their budgeting flexibility for municipal fire departments.
  • Municipal fire departments — protected from year-over-year operating budget cuts under most circumstances.
  • State Treasurer’s Office and Department of Revenue — administrative duty to track notifications and withhold/distribute state-shared revenues.
  • Other local programs/municipal priorities — potentially affected if a municipality cannot reduce fire budgets and must reallocate funds elsewhere.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Enforcement via withholding state-shared revenues creates a strong fiscal incentive for municipalities to maintain or restore fire department budgets.
  • Could limit municipal budget flexibility during fiscal stress; the bill includes an exception for inability to pay, but the criteria for that exception may raise questions in practice.
  • Administrative workload for the Treasurer and Department of Revenue to coordinate withholding and track restorations.
  • Possible legal or intergovernmental disputes over what constitutes a reduction, restoration, or inability to pay.

Legislative status and procedural notes

  • Arizona text labeled “Introduced Version” and “House Engrossed Version”; bill language references Arizona statutes (Title 9, § 42-5029, § 43-206).
  • Status lines in the file are inconsistent and appear to combine actions from different jurisdictions. The header metadata supplied by the user lists:
    • Bill Number: HB 2943; Title: EXECUTIVE & GA PAY RAISES; Introduced: Feb 18, 2025; Status: Referred to Rules Committee.
  • The document also contains partial Illinois bill language concerning amendments to the Salaries Act and General Assembly Compensation Act (appears to remove or alter changes from Public Act 102-1115). That material is unrelated to the Arizona municipal fire department provisions and should be treated as separate legislation.

If you want, I can:
- Produce a clean, Arizona-only summary (without the Illinois fragments),
- Draft a short explainer of the Illinois compensation language found in the document, or
- Identify likely implementation questions municipalities or the Treasurer would need to resolve.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.