WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 929

Relating to prohibiting a school district from procuring training, insurance products and risk pool participation, good or supplies from a buy board, and any investment or professional services from certain nonprofit associations or organizations.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Brian Harrison

HB 929 prohibits Texas school districts from using cooperative buying arrangements and certain nonprofits for procurement, potentially increasing costs and administrative complexity.

Referred to Public Education
#education--schooldistricts(i0220) #ethics(i0345) #lobbyists&lobbying(s3141)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 929

Legislative bill overview

HB 929 would prohibit Texas school districts from purchasing training, insurance products, risk pool participation, goods, supplies, and professional services through cooperative purchasing agreements (known as "buy boards") or from certain nonprofit associations and organizations. The bill essentially blocks schools from using these third-party procurement intermediaries that have traditionally streamlined bulk purchasing.

Why is this important

School districts currently use buy boards and nonprofit purchasing cooperatives to reduce costs through group purchasing power and administrative efficiency. Restricting these purchasing methods could force districts to procure items individually, potentially increasing costs, reducing bargaining power, and complicating procurement processes that serve hundreds of schools across Texas.

Potential points of contention

  • Cost implications: Eliminating group purchasing may increase school district expenses on supplies, insurance, and services, straining already tight budgets
  • Administrative burden: Removing centralized procurement pathways could significantly increase administrative workload for individual districts to manage separate vendor relationships
  • Competitive access: Certain nonprofits and associations may serve as critical intermediaries for small or rural districts to access products and services they couldn't negotiate independently
  • Lack of stated rationale: The bill provides no explicit explanation for why these procurement methods should be prohibited, leaving the underlying policy concern unclear

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.