WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

AB 483

Relating to: local wheel tax referenda. (FE)

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Elijah Behnke and 9 co-sponsors

AB 483 requires licensing boards to provide priority review for initial health-licensure applications filed by providers serving historically underserved communities, speeding staffing.

Representative Mursau withdrawn as a coauthor
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · AB 483

AB 483 — Priority review of certain health-profession licensure applications (BDR 40-354)

Status: Enacted 2025 (chaptered).
Introduced: 2025. Sponsor: Assembly Committee on Health and Human Services (on behalf of the Joint Interim Standing Committee on Health and Human Services).

Purpose

To accelerate licensure of health care providers who will work primarily in historically underserved communities by requiring specified licensing entities to adopt a process that gives priority review to qualifying initial licensure applications.

Key provisions

  • Requires certain licensing authorities to establish a process to prioritize the review of initial licensure applications when the applicant demonstrates they will provide health care primarily in a “historically underserved community.”
  • Entities required to adopt priority-review processes:
    • A district board of health in a county with population ≥700,000 (currently Clark County),
    • The State Board (State Board of Health),
    • Professional licensing boards that regulate medical, dental, or nursing professions.
  • Definition — “Historically underserved community” includes:
    • A census tract designated a “qualified census tract” by HUD (26 U.S.C. § 42(d)(5)(B)(ii)); or
    • A census tract in which at least 20% of households were not proficient in English in the most recent census; or
    • Qualified tribal land (per NRS 370.0325).
  • Demonstration of eligibility:
    • Regulations must, at minimum, allow an applicant to show eligibility by submitting a letter from an employer located in a historically underserved community stating the applicant has accepted employment and the planned start date.
    • Boards may specify additional acceptable evidence.
  • Scope: Applies to initial licensure (renewal applications excluded by amendment). Focused on professions regulated by the specified boards (emergency medical services, medical, dental, nursing, etc.).

Who is affected

  • Prospective health care providers seeking initial licensure to practice in Nevada, particularly those committing to serve underserved areas.
  • Licensing boards and health authorities responsible for processing applications (must adopt and implement priority-review procedures).
  • Local governments and health employers in underserved areas (may benefit from faster staffing; may incur administrative effects).

Procedural & fiscal notes

  • Boards are required to adopt implementing regulations and procedures to operationalize priority review.
  • Fiscal impact: The bill may have fiscal effects on state and local government operations and was identified as containing an unfunded mandate (sections noted in legislative history). Boards will incur administrative responsibilities to implement the new processes.
  • Effective timing: Applies to initial applications after the boards adopt the required regulations/procedures; legislative history shows enactment in 2025. (See board rulemaking for exact operational dates.)

Expected impact

  • Potential to shorten licensure timelines for clinicians committing to practice in designated underserved areas, supporting workforce deployment to high-need communities.
  • Administrative burden and costs for licensing entities to create, administer, and track priority-review processes — noted as a possible unfunded mandate.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.