WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 1584

Relating to early voting by mail by any qualified voter and to the repeal of certain criminal offenses concerning the solicitation and distribution of an application to vote by mail.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Sarah Eckhardt

SB 1584 expands Texas mail-in voting to all qualified voters and repeals criminal penalties for soliciting mail ballot applications.

Referred to State Affairs
#aging(i0015) #civilcommitment(s0002) #corrections--jails&prisons(i0092) #disabilities #personswith(i0380) #elections--earlyvoting(i0260) #elections--registration&suffrage(i0265)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1584

Legislative bill overview

SB 1584 would expand mail-in voting access in Texas by allowing any qualified voter to vote by mail, rather than limiting it to specific categories (elderly, disabled, out-of-state voters). The bill would also repeal criminal penalties currently associated with soliciting or distributing mail-in voting applications.

Why is this important

Mail-in voting access directly affects voter participation rates and election administration. Texas currently has among the most restrictive mail-in voting policies in the nation, and this change would significantly alter who can participate through that method. The repeal of solicitation penalties would remove legal barriers to voter registration and voting access organizations.

Potential points of contention

  • Voter fraud concerns vs. accessibility: Opponents may argue expanded mail voting increases fraud risk, while supporters contend current restrictions have no evidence of preventing fraud and instead limit legitimate participation
  • State election security philosophy: The bill represents a fundamental shift from Texas's restrictive approach to voting access, which some view as election integrity safeguards and others view as voter suppression
  • Solicitation repeal implications: Removing penalties on mail-ballot application solicitation could increase voter contact/registration efforts, which some see as beneficial outreach and others view as potential coercion or manipulation

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.