WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 4795

Relating to duties of the vital statistics unit of the Department of State Health Services in relation to certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship, including in regard to the electronic transmission of certain information.

89th Legislature (2025) Introduced by Liz Campos and 2 co-sponsors

Texas law now requires vital statistics to electronically transmit birth certificates and vital records in family law cases, accelerating custody and paternity proceedings while raising data security questions.

Effective on 9/1/25
#electronicinformationsystems(i0311) #family&protectiveservices #departmentof(v0461) #family--parent&child(i0355) #health&humanservicescommission(v0177) #health--general(i0385) #statehealthservices #departmentof(v0463) #vitalstatistics&records(s2714)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 4795

Legislative bill overview

HB 4795 expands the duties of Texas's vital statistics unit to facilitate electronic transmission of vital records information in cases involving parent-child relationships, such as custody disputes, adoptions, and paternity suits. The bill streamlines how the Department of State Health Services shares birth certificates and related vital records with courts and legal parties in family law proceedings, likely through digital channels rather than traditional paper-based methods.

Why is this important

Family law cases often require rapid access to vital records to establish legal relationships and custody rights, and delays in obtaining these documents can slow case resolution and affect families' situations. Enabling electronic transmission reduces administrative burden, speeds up legal processes, and improves access to critical identification documents needed for court proceedings.

Potential points of contention

  • Privacy and data security concerns: Expanded electronic transmission of birth certificates and vital records raises questions about how sensitive personal information is protected against unauthorized access or breaches
  • Access scope uncertainty: The bill doesn't clearly define which parties (attorneys, judges, third parties) can electronically access these records or what safeguards prevent misuse by individuals without legitimate legal standing
  • Implementation costs and timeline: Digitizing vital records systems and establishing secure electronic transmission infrastructure requires significant technology investment and training before the September 1, 2025 effective date

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.