WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 378

Relating to charges for senior citizens to use areas under the jurisdiction of the State Parks and Recreation Department.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Daniel Bonham and 1 co-sponsor

SB 378 hikes state excise taxes on beer, wine, spirits, cider, and fortified wine by 20% starting July 1, 2025, boosting revenue and reducing alcohol harms.

In committee upon adjournment.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 378

SB 378 — Liquor Tax Rates (summary)

Status: Action postponed indefinitely
Introduced: February 13, 2025
Subject areas: Alcohol & drugs; taxation

Main purpose

Raise state excise taxes on alcoholic beverages (beer, wine, spirits, cider, fortified wine) by 20% to (1) increase state revenues and (2) reduce excessive alcohol consumption and related harms.

Key provisions

  • Increase excise tax rates (proposed new rates shown):
    • Beer: from $0.41 per gallon → $0.49 per gallon (20% increase)
    • Wine: from $0.45 per liter → $0.54 per liter (20% increase)
    • Distilled spirits: from $1.60 per liter → $1.92 per liter (20% increase)
    • Cider: from $0.41 per gallon → $0.49 per gallon (20% increase)
    • Fortified wine: from $1.50 per liter → $1.80 per liter (20% increase)
  • Effective date: July 1, 2025 (per fiscal analysis).
  • No changes proposed to other excise categories beyond those listed.
  • Technical/administrative provisions follow existing excise tax collection mechanisms (no separate enforcement regime in the analysis).

Fiscal impact (as estimated by state revenue analysts)

  • Estimated increase in statewide revenue of approximately $4.6 million in FY2026 (first partial/initial year).
  • Revenue projections model modest consumption declines in response to higher prices; the Taxation and Revenue Department applied assumed price elasticities of demand of:
    • Beer: −0.11
    • Wine: −0.19
    • Distilled spirits: −0.20
  • Analysts assumed wholesalers pass through the tax by a factor of 1.5 to retail consumers.
  • Estimates reflect expected small declines in in-state purchases; fiscal risk noted if consumption shifts to neighboring states or online sources.

Who would be affected

  • Consumers: likely to face higher retail prices as wholesalers/retailers pass through the excise increase.
  • Wholesalers/retailers: administrative burden limited (collection remains via existing mechanisms), but retail volumes may decline slightly.
  • State finances: modest revenue gain intended for General Fund and possibly related programs; exact allocation depends on state budgeting.
  • Public health: small reductions in alcohol consumption projected, which proponents cite as a public-health benefit.

Policy context and considerations

  • Analysts cite New Mexico (state referenced in the fiscal analysis) as having elevated alcohol-related mortality and treatment gaps; the measure is presented in that context as both revenue and public‑health policy.
  • Research basis: the fiscal office relied on meta‑analytic elasticities (Wagenaar et al., 2009) to estimate consumption response. Projections acknowledge uncertainty — especially potential cross‑border or online purchases and substitution effects.

Procedural / timeline notes

  • Introduced February 13, 2025; effective date in the fiscal estimate is July 1, 2025.
  • As provided in the brief, current legislative status: action postponed indefinitely.
  • Related legislative items noted in the analysis (e.g., HB 417, HB 460, other Senate bills) reflect concurrent proposals addressing alcohol taxation/fees.

If you want, I can:
- Produce a short one‑page fiscal breakdown by fund/year using the estimates in the fiscal note, or
- Compare SB 378’s proposed excise increases to neighboring states’ current rates.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.