Bill
SB 1120
Update AZ rules for creating fire, park, sanitary, and hospital districts to require assessor lists, valuation estimates, impact statements, hearings, and fixed petition thresholds.
Summary (based on available engrossed/chaptered excerpts)
Status: Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 filed pursuant to Senate Rule 3‑9(b); referred to Assignments. Introduced February 5, 2025.
Note: The bill text provided is an excerpted/partially truncated set of versions. This summary highlights the bill’s principal purpose and the key changes reflected in the available Arizona engrossed/chaptered language (amending A.R.S. §48‑261 and adding §48‑261.01; also amending §48‑262 and §48‑266).
Purpose and intent
- Update and clarify the statutory process for creating certain special taxing districts (specifically: fire districts, community park maintenance districts, sanitary districts, and hospital districts for hospitals or urgent care centers).
- Improve information available to petition organizers and property owners by specifying assessor data, valuation measures, notice and petition procedures, and timelines.
Key provisions and changes
- Assessor data: Requires the county assessor to provide to a person proposing a district a detailed list of all taxable real and personal properties within the proposed district area (language in some versions expands from “real” to “real and personal” property).
- Use of assessor records for maps/valuations: Treats the county assessor’s parcel map and the assessed valuation shown in assessor records (as prescribed by A.R.S. §42‑17052) at the time the district impact statement is submitted as sufficient for required maps and for determining assessed valuations.
- District impact statement requirements: The impact statement must include, at minimum:
- legal description and map sufficient for property owners to determine inclusion;
- the detailed assessor list of taxable properties;
- an estimate of total assessed valuation within the proposed district;
- an estimate of change in property tax liability for a typical resident;
- lists/explanations of benefits and possible injuries from the district;
- names/addresses/occupations of proposed organizing board members;
- a 5‑year scope of services including projected capital expenditures and personnel growth.
- Hearing and board review: After submission, the county board of supervisors must schedule a hearing (30–60 days out). The board may require amendments to the impact statement and will determine whether creation “promotes public health, comfort, convenience, necessity or welfare” before authorizing petition circulation.
- Petition circulation and locking valuations/signature thresholds:
- When the board approves circulation, the clerk has 15 days to determine the minimum number of signatures and the assessed‑valuation threshold required for statutory compliance; once set those figures are fixed for the circulation period.
- Petition circulation may be limited (e.g., for multi‑county park districts the petitions cannot circulate until each affected county board approves).
- The board may authorize circulation of petitions for only one proposed new district of the same type affecting a given property owner at a time; restrictions apply before new circulations are permitted.
- Other procedural items noted: required notice to property owners (mailed and posted), publication requirements, and the board’s order being final with a six‑month refile waiting period after denial (as shown in the excerpts).
Who is affected
- Property owners (real and, depending on version, personal property) within areas proposed for special taxing districts — they will receive enhanced notice and clearer valuation estimates.
- Petition organizers and prospective district organizers — must use assessor data, prepare more detailed impact statements, and follow tightened timing/threshold rules.
- County assessors, clerks and boards of supervisors — additional duties to supply lists, fix valuation/signature thresholds and hold hearings.
- Prospective districts (fire, park maintenance, sanitary, hospital/urgent care) — potential change in how districts are proposed and validated by petition.
Procedural/timeline highlights
- Impact statement filed → board schedules hearing (30–60 days) → if approved, clerk determines signature/valuation requirements within 15 days → petitions may be circulated (subject to one‑year limits and other restrictions).
- The board’s denial of petition circulation bars refiling for six months; clerk‑determined thresholds are fixed for the petition period.
Limitations / caveat
- The provided text is truncated; the bill also amends A.R.S. §§48‑262 and 48‑266 and adds §48‑261.01 — those sections were not fully included in the excerpts. For complete legal effect, consult the full engrossed/chaptered bill as enrolled and the final statutory language once codified.
If you want, I can:
- Provide a side‑by‑side comparison showing exact wording changes (where available) between current law and the bill; or
- Summarize the specific thresholds/requirements in §§48‑262 and 48‑266 once you provide the full text of those sections.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
