Relates to training for school security guards
Cap credit-card surcharges to the seller's actual processing cost and require clear upfront disclosure to customers at all channels (in-person, online, mobile, or phone).
Cap credit-card surcharges to the seller's actual processing cost and require clear upfront disclosure to customers at all channels (in-person, online, mobile, or phone).
Title shown in docket header: An Act relative to transparency in credit card fees
Note: The bill metadata includes inconsistent items (a different short title referencing school security guards and out-of-state sponsors). This summary relies on the bill text filed with the Massachusetts Senate (S.194 / Senate Docket No. 851), which amends Chapter 140D, §28A and deals with credit‑card surcharge limits and disclosure.
To limit and require disclosure of merchant surcharges imposed on customers who pay with credit cards for transactions occurring in Massachusetts. The bill caps surcharges at the merchant’s actual cost to process the credit‑card payment and requires clear, advance notice to customers about any surcharge.
Replaces existing paragraph (2) of subsection (a) of G.L. c.140D, §28A with two new paragraphs:
The bill text does not specify the mechanism for calculating “actual cost,” enforcement penalties, or an effective date in the excerpt provided; enforcement would be pursuant to existing authorities under Chapter 140D unless otherwise specified elsewhere.
If you would like, I can:
- Compare this proposed language to current Massachusetts law on surcharges and to other states’ approaches; or
- Draft a short Q&A for merchants explaining compliance steps (calculating costs, signage text, online checkout language).
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.