WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 6305

Relates to the unlawful use of a remotely piloted aircraft

2025 Regular Session Introduced by James Sanders

S 6305 would ban unlawful drone use, establishing prohibitions, penalties, and enforcement to regulate drone operations and protect public safety and privacy.

REFERRED TO CODES
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 6305

Summary of Bill S 6305 – Relates to the unlawful use of a remotely piloted aircraft

Overview

  • Bill Number: S 6305
  • Title: Relates to the unlawful use of a remotely piloted aircraft
  • Status: Referred to Codes (pending committee consideration)
  • Introduced: March 10, 2025

  • Sponsor: James Sanders Jr. (primary)

  • Related Bills (prior-session): A 8377, S 5944, A 1881, S 3235, S 4823

Purpose and intent

Based on the title, S 6305 aims to address the unlawful use of remotely piloted aircraft (RPAs, commonly referred to as drones) within the state. While the exact text is not provided here, the bill’s placement in the Codes committee and its sponsorship suggest it would establish or clarify legal prohibitions related to drone operations and set forth enforcement mechanisms and penalties.

Key provisions (provisions to be confirmed in the full text)

The specific statutory language is not included in the summary. In bills of this nature, typical elements often addressed include:
- Definitions related to remotely piloted aircraft and related terms (e.g., what constitutes unlawful use).
- Prohibitions on certain drone activities (e.g., flying in restricted airspace, near critical infrastructure, over private property without consent, endangering public safety).
- Penalties and enforcement mechanisms (criminal or civil penalties, fines, and who has authority to enforce).
- Exemptions or permissible uses (e.g., government/military use, law enforcement, search-and-rescue, authorized research, or agricultural applications).
- Privacy considerations and protections.
- Procedures for reporting, investigation, and adjudication of violations.
- Any required compliance standards or operator responsibilities (registration, licensing, or operator training).

Note: The exact provisions for S 6305 should be reviewed from the official bill text once available to ensure precise obligations and penalties.

Who would be affected

  • RPA/D drone operators and businesses using drones for commercial or private purposes.
  • Law enforcement and regulatory agencies responsible for enforcement.
  • Property owners and the public who may be affected by drone activity (privacy, safety, nuisance concerns).
  • Critical infrastructure operators (e.g., utilities, transportation facilities) that could be impacted by drone restrictions in proximity to facilities.
  • Any entities engaged in drone-related activities subject to the bill’s prohibitions and requirements.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Status: Referred to the Codes committee, indicating the bill is at an early stage of the legislative process.
  • Actions to note: The Legislative Actions section lists the bill as referred to Codes on March 10, 2025 (duplicated entry). No further actions are listed in this summary.
  • Next steps in the process: If the committee advances the bill, it would move to the full chamber for consideration, potential amendments, and votes; subsequently, actions would be needed in the other house (if applicable) and then a conference if negotiated.

Additional context

  • The sponsor, James Sanders Jr., and the listed prior-session related bills may indicate ongoing interest in strengthening the regulatory framework around drone use. Tracking the official bill text and committee reports will provide definitive details on provisions, penalties, exemptions, and implementation timelines.

For readers seeking more detail

  • Review the official bill text and amendments once published by the legislature to understand precise prohibitions, penalties, and exemptions.
  • Monitor committee hearings and floor actions in the Codes committee for S 6305 to learn about amendments and potential passage.
  • Check related bills (A 8377, S 5944, A 1881, S 3235, S 4823) for overlapping or prior proposals that may inform anticipated changes.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.