WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 3338

Relates to the scheduling of a fact finding hearing after the issuance of a temporary order of protection in family court

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Jake Ashby and 1 co-sponsor

Requires timely scheduling of a fact-finding hearing after a temporary order of protection in family court, improving due process for petitioners and respondents.

REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 3338

Summary of S 3338 — Scheduling of a Fact-Finding Hearing After Temporary Order of Protection (Family Court)

Overview

S 3338 is a proposed New York State bill introduced on January 27, 2025, titled “Relates to the scheduling of a fact finding hearing after the issuance of a temporary order of protection in family court.” The bill is currently in the Judiciary committee stage, having been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee on the date of introduction.

Purpose and intent

  • The core aim, as indicated by the title, is to address the scheduling process for a fact-finding hearing following the issuance of a temporary order of protection (TOP) in family court.
  • The measure appears intended to establish or modify procedural timelines to ensure that a fact-finding hearing is scheduled in a timely manner after a TOP is issued, contributing to more predictable case management in family court proceedings.

Key provisions (as indicated by the bill’s title)

  • The exact statutory text is not provided in the available material. Based on the title, the bill would establish rules or requirements governing when and how a fact-finding hearing must be scheduled after the issuance of a temporary order of protection.
  • It may set deadlines, sequencing, or administrative procedures to streamline scheduling, reduce delays, or clarify responsibilities for courts and parties.

Who would be affected

  • Petitioners and respondents in family court proceedings involving temporary protective orders.
  • Family court judges and court staff (clerks, scheduling personnel, and administrative offices) responsible for docketing and scheduling hearings.
  • Attorneys representing petitioners, respondents, and any intervening parties.
  • The broader court administration community, and potentially advocates and service providers involved in protection-order cases.

Procedural status and timeline

  • Introduced: January 27, 2025.
  • Status: Referred to Senate Judiciary (Judiciary) committee. No further action details are provided in the current material.
  • There are related bills in prior sessions (A 8769, A 3289, S 4251) and companion bills (A 510) suggesting ongoing interest in refining protection-order procedures.

Legislative context and related bills

  • Related measures in prior sessions indicate a broader policy focus on timely scheduling of hearings following TOPs.
  • The companion and related bill activity may influence future consideration, amendments, or consolidation with other reform proposals.

Potential impact

  • Positive: Could lead to more predictable and timely fact-finding hearings after TOPs, improving due process and case efficiency in family court.
  • Administrative considerations: May require changes to court calendars, notification procedures, and staff training.
  • Economic/operational: Potential impact on court resources and scheduling practices; impact would hinge on the precise deadlines or standards enacted.

Next steps for readers

  • Monitor Judiciary committee action for amendments, language, or a potential floor vote.
  • Review the official bill text when available to understand precise deadlines, definitions, and affected sections.
  • Consider related bills (A 8769, A 3289, S 4251, A 510) for broader context and potential concurrent legislation.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.