WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 2193

Relates to the definition of "immediate family" for the transfer of certain commercial fishing licenses

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Tony Palumbo

Allows certain municipal employees in educational collaboratives to have financial interests in contracts for educational services, with disclosures and approved processes.

PRINT NUMBER 2193A
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 2193

Summary — S.2193 (Print No. 2193A): An Act Relative to Educational Collaboratives

Note on source materials: the package you provided contains conflicting metadata (a different short title about commercial fishing licenses and an unrelated list of sponsors). This summary is based on the bill text included in the file, which amends Massachusetts General Laws (Chapter 268A, Section 20) to create limited conflict-of-interest exceptions for employees of educational collaboratives and their member school districts.

Purpose

To permit certain municipal employees who work for regional public educational agencies (educational collaboratives established under G.L. c.40, §4E) or their member school districts to have a direct or indirect financial interest in contracts to provide educational, professional development, or related services — subject to disclosure and approval — by creating an explicit exception to G.L. c.268A, §20 (the Commonwealth’s conflict-of-interest statute).

Key provisions

  • Amends Section 20 of Chapter 268A by adding an exception allowing employees of:

    • educational collaboratives, and
    • member school districts of such collaboratives to have a direct or indirect financial interest in contracts or agreements for providing educational and related services to the collaborative or to member districts, subject to conditions (see below).

  • Disclosure requirements:

    • The employee must file written disclosure(s) of the contract(s) with the relevant entities (the collaborative and/or the member school district(s)) with which they are contracting.

  • Approval requirements:

    • The proposed arrangement must be approved by the employee’s appointing authority before the employee provides the services.
    • Specific permutations require approval by the head of the educational collaborative and/or the appointing authority of the member school district, depending on which entity is contracting.

  • Public process safeguard:

    • For each contract covered by this exception, there must either have been public notice of the contract or the contract must have been created through an open competitive process.

  • Scope/definitions:

    • “Educational services” are defined broadly to include services related to the education of students, youth, and families, and professional development/training for educators, administrators, paraprofessionals, and community-based personnel working on behalf of public education.
    • “Related services” are those services defined in 603 CMR 28.02(18) (Mass. regulations governing special education-related services).

Who would be affected

  • Municipal employees who are employed by:
    • an educational collaborative established under G.L. c.40, §4E, and/or
    • member school districts of such collaboratives.
  • Educational collaboratives and their member districts (as contracting entities).
  • Potential private vendors or individual consultants who are also municipal employees and seek to provide services to collaboratives or districts.

Procedural / timeline aspects (from provided materials)

  • Bill filed / docketed in Massachusetts Senate: filed Jan. 13, 2025 (Senate Docket No. 547).
  • Petitioners listed in the bill text: Sen. Jacob R. Oliveira and several co-petitioners.
  • Print number assigned: 2193A (noted June 2, 2025).
  • Referred to committee: State Administration and Regulatory Oversight (per the provided legislative actions).
  • Other scheduling entries in the materials reference hearings and committee referrals; the materials contain inconsistent dates and committee names. Consult the official legislative website (Massachusetts Legislature) for the current precise status and next steps.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Pros:

    • Facilitates access to specialized services by permitting collaboratives to contract with knowledgeable municipal employees (who may be uniquely qualified).
    • Clarifies and streamlines the ability of collaboratives and districts to use in‑house expertise, possibly reducing procurement costs and improving service continuity.

  • Risks / safeguards:

    • Creating a conflict-of-interest exception increases the need for robust disclosure and independent approvals to prevent favoritism or misuse of public resources.
    • The requirement for public notice or open competitive process is a key safeguard; enforcement and transparency mechanisms will determine how effectively abuse is prevented.
    • Local appointing authorities and collaborative heads will bear responsibility for reviewing and approving such arrangements; training and clear standards may be needed.

If you want, I can:
- Produce a side‑by‑side comparison of the current Section 20 language and the proposed amended text; or
- Check and reconcile the inconsistent metadata (title, sponsors, committees) against the Massachusetts Legislature’s public docket to provide an authoritative status update.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.