Relates to residency restrictions for sex offenders
Requires upfront all-in pricing, bans drip pricing and speculative ticketing, and ensures refunds for cancellations, protecting consumers buying event tickets.
Requires upfront all-in pricing, bans drip pricing and speculative ticketing, and ensures refunds for cancellations, protecting consumers buying event tickets.
Note on sources and conflicting metadata
- The committee report included with this file (S. Rept. 119‑17) and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation action refer to a federal bill S. 281 titled the “Transparency In Charges for Key Events Ticketing Act” (TICKET Act). Other materials in the package (state docket language about motor‑vehicle debt waivers and an initial title referencing residency restrictions for sex offenders) appear to be unrelated items that share the same bill number in different contexts. This summary focuses on the federal TICKET Act described in S. Rept. 119‑17.
Purpose
- The TICKET Act is a consumer‑protection bill intended to eliminate “drip pricing” and hidden fees in the live event ticketing marketplace, to ban speculative ticket listings, and to require clearer refund practices for canceled or postponed live events. Its stated goal is to ensure consumers see the full, all‑in price up front and to discourage deceptive pricing and speculative sales practices.
Key provisions (as described in committee report)
- Up‑front, all‑in pricing: Requires ticket sellers to disclose the total price payable by the consumer (face value plus all mandatory fees and charges) at the point of initial offer/advertising, so consumers can comparison‑shop on an apples‑to‑apples basis.
- Ban on drip pricing: Prohibits practices in which mandatory fees are withheld until later steps in the checkout flow (i.e., advertising only a base price and revealing required fees later).
- Prohibition on speculative ticketing: Bans sale/listing of tickets that the seller does not actually possess or have a confirmed right to sell at the time of listing (intended to curb secondary‑market listings for tickets not yet acquired).
- Refunds for cancellations/postponements: Requires specified refund or remediation policies when live events are cancelled or postponed (report text emphasizes consumer refund protections; bill text not fully included in excerpt).
- Enforcement and remedies: The report references FTC concerns and prior agency work on drip pricing; the bill as reported includes enforcement mechanisms and penalties (specific enforcement authority and penalties were not fully excerpted in the provided text).
Who is affected
- Consumers purchasing primary or secondary market event tickets (concerts, sports, theater, etc.) — greater price transparency and potentially stronger refund rights.
- Ticket sellers, ticketing platforms and exchanges, brokers/resellers, venues, and promoters — required to change advertising, checkout flows, and listing practices; speculative resellers would need to ensure holdings or contractual rights before listing.
- Potential indirect effects on pricing structure, platform revenues (fee presentation), and resale market practices.
Procedural status and timeline
- Introduced in the Senate: January 28, 2025.
- Referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation: January 28, 2025.
- Committee ordered reported with amendments: February 5, 2025.
- Reported by committee (with amendments) and printed as S. Rept. 119‑17: April 29, 2025; placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders (Calendar No. 63) the same day.
- Related/companion measures: HR 1768, HR 1402 and other companion or related state bills are noted in the legislative record.
Potential impacts and considerations
- Consumer benefits: clearer up‑front pricing, fewer surprise fees, better ability to comparison‑shop, and clearer remedies for cancellations.
- Industry impacts: ticketing sellers and marketplaces will need to redesign listing and checkout processes, potentially changing how fees are allocated and disclosed; resale brokers may need to modify inventory/listing practices to comply with the speculative‑sale ban.
- Enforcement details (agencies, civil penalties, private rights of action) are important to practical effect but were not fully included in the excerpted report; final impact will depend on the bill’s precise enforcement provisions and any amendments adopted during floor consideration.
If you want, I can:
- Extract and summarize the bill’s full statutory text (if you provide it), including specific enforcement language and definitions; or
- Produce a short one‑page explainer for consumers or for ticketing businesses on what compliance would likely require.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.