WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

A 165

Relates to outdoor restraints of dogs

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Alex Bores and 7 co-sponsors

A 165 - Relates to Outdoor Restraints of Dogs OverviewBill Number: A 165 Title: Relates to outdoor restraints of dogs Status: REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE Introduced: January 08, 202

REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · A 165

A 165 - Relates to Outdoor Restraints of Dogs

Overview

Bill Number: A 165
Title: Relates to outdoor restraints of dogs
Status: REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE
Introduced: January 08, 2025

Purpose and Intent

The purpose of this bill is to establish new standards and restrictions for the outdoor restraint of dogs in order to promote the health, safety, and welfare of canines. The legislation aims to address concerns about the potential risks and inhumane treatment associated with certain tethering and containment practices.

Key Provisions

  • Prohibits the use of choke collars, prong collars, or any restraint that may cause injury or pain when used for outdoor tethering
  • Requires that outdoor restraints be at least 10 feet in length and allow the dog to move about freely and have access to shade, shelter, food, and water
  • Limits the amount of time a dog can be tethered outdoors to no more than 4 hours per day
  • Bans the use of restraints that restrict the dog's ability to stand, sit, lie down, or move about comfortably
  • Mandates that dogs under 6 months old or nursing mothers not be tethered outdoors at all
  • Establishes fines and penalties for violations, including potential animal cruelty charges for repeat offenders

Affected Parties and Impacts

This bill would impact all dog owners who keep their pets restrained outdoors, whether for security, containment, or other purposes. The new standards are intended to prevent the mistreatment of dogs and ensure their basic needs are met when left outside. Proponents argue it will improve canine welfare, while critics contend it places undue burdens on responsible pet owners.

Procedural and Timeline Considerations

A 165 has been referred to the Assembly Agriculture Committee for initial consideration. If approved there, it would then move to the full Assembly for a vote. The bill's prospects remain uncertain, as it faces opposition from some agricultural and rural interests. However, animal welfare advocates are pushing for its passage to establish stronger protections for dogs.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.