WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 637

Relates to notice of transfer of sex offender to community program or residence

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Patrick Gallivan

S 637 bars DEP from mandating primary-residence BANRT septic upgrades unless an enforceable Watershed Permit exists and funding is provided by state appropriation.

REFERRED TO DISABILITIES
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 637

Bill Summary — S 637 (2025)

Title (per file): An Act relative to Title 5 of the State Environmental Code
Bill #: S 637
Introduced: February 19, 2025
Current status (selected actions): Referred to committee(s); hearing scheduled 06/17/2025; ordered reported without amendment by Committee on Indian Affairs (03/05/2025).
Key statutory references: 310 CMR 15.000 (Title 5 — septic/onsite systems); 314 CMR 21.00 (Watershed Permit regulations)

Note: the packet submitted includes an initial, conflicting short title regarding "notice of transfer of sex offender to community program or residence." The actual enacted text of S 637 provided here addresses Title 5 (septic systems / nitrogen-reduction), not sex-offender notification. This summary treats the bill text as the authoritative content.

Purpose / Intent

S 637 limits the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection’s (DEP) ability to require owners of primary-residence dwellings to install or upgrade to “Best Available Nitrogen Reducing Technology” (BANRT) under Title 5 regulations, except in narrowly defined circumstances tied to Watershed Permits and funding. The bill conditions enforcement on funding availability for cost obligations assigned to local government units (LGUs) or to primary residences.

Key provisions

  • Prohibits the department from requiring a dwelling used as a primary residence to install or upgrade to Best Available Nitrogen Reducing Technology under 310 CMR 15.000, unless:
    • The installation/upgrade is required by an enforceable Watershed Permit issued under 314 CMR 21.00.
  • Adds a funding condition for Watershed Permits:
    • No Watershed Permit requiring such upgrades shall be required or enforced unless the department or the General Court, by appropriation, provides for any cost obligations imposed on the Local Government Unit — including costs that would fall on a primary residence.
  • Effective date: the act takes effect upon passage.

Who is affected

  • Primary-residence homeowners who might otherwise be required to install/upgrade nitrogen-reducing septic technologies under Title 5.
  • Local Government Units (towns/cities) responsible for implementing or enforcing Watershed Permits and possibly covering local costs.
  • Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), which would face a prohibition on certain regulatory requirements unless the funding preconditions are met.
  • Potential indirect effects on water quality programs that rely on onsite nitrogen reductions as a tool to meet watershed or embayment nitrogen targets.

Potential implications

  • Financial: shifts emphasis to state appropriations before local cost-sharing or homeowner obligations can be enforced; could delay local upgrade programs pending available funding.
  • Regulatory: restricts DEP’s unilateral ability to mandate BANRT retrofits for primary residences under Title 5, potentially slowing nitrogen-reduction progress in sensitive watersheds.
  • Administrative: creates a prerequisite (appropriation) for enforcement of Watershed Permits that impose local or homeowner costs.

Legislative timeline & related legislation

  • Introduced: 02/19/2025.
  • Referred to committees (Environment and Natural Resources; also listed as referred to Disabilities and Indian Affairs in records).
  • Committee hearing scheduled: 06/17/2025 (A-1).
  • Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably by Committee on Indian Affairs: 03/05/2025.
  • Related/companion bills: HR 1482; SD 448 (replaces); prior-session bills S 396, S 7064, S 2132, S 718, S 1716, S 249.

Notes

  • The bill conditions environmental regulatory enforcement on state funding commitments, which may raise policy and budgetary trade-offs between state fiscal policy and local/household responsibility for environmental remediation.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.