WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 638

Relates to gun buyback programs

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Patrick Gallivan

Creates a 23-member commission to study financing for wastewater upgrades to cut nitrogen pollution in Buzzards Bay region and propose funding options.

REFERRED TO CODES
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 638

Summary — S.638 (Resolve establishing a coastal waters wastewater financing commission)

Note on source material: The provided packet contains mixed metadata (references to other statutes and unrelated titles). The bill text below addresses a Massachusetts Senate resolve (Senate No. 638) to create a special legislative commission to study financing wastewater infrastructure to address nitrogen pollution in the Buzzards Bay / southeastern Massachusetts region. This summary focuses on that resolve.

Purpose / Intent

Create a 23‑member special legislative commission to study wastewater infrastructure needs tied to nitrogen pollution in the Buzzards Bay watershed area and to recommend specific, fair and equitable revenue and financing sources to pay for necessary upgrades, expansions, and septic system improvements.

Geographic scope / Who is affected

  • Targeted municipalities: Acushnet, Carver, Dartmouth, Fairhaven, Lakeville, Gosnold, Marion, Mattapoisett, Middleborough, New Bedford, Plymouth, Rochester, Wareham, and Westport.
  • Affects: municipal governments, wastewater utilities, septic system owners/homeowners, regional planning entities, taxpayers, environmental stakeholders and businesses in the affected towns, and state agencies responsible for environment and finance.

Key provisions

  • Establishes a 23‑member special legislative commission:
    • Co‑chairs: chairs of the Joint Committee on Environment and Natural Resources.
    • Members include: EOEEA Secretary (or designee); Secretary of Administration and Finance (or designee); Southeastern Regional Planning & Economic Development District executive director (or designee); president of Buzzards Bay Coalition (or designee); executive director of One Southcoast Chamber (or designee); one southeastern resident appointed by the Senate President; one by the House Speaker; and one appointee from the select board or mayor of each of the 14 listed communities.
  • Appointment and convening deadlines:
    • All appointments due no later than 30 days after the resolve’s effective date.
    • Co‑chairs must convene the first meeting within 45 days after all appointments are made.
  • Scope of study:
    • Assess financial needs for reducing nutrient (nitrogen) pollution, including costs to:
    • Expand sewer infrastructure and connect septic systems;
    • Expand and upgrade treatment capacity and treatment levels at wastewater facilities;
    • Construct additional wastewater facilities for expanded service areas;
    • Reduce combined sewer overflows (CSOs);
    • Upgrade septic systems to nitrogen‑reducing systems.
    • Examine potential funding sources and best municipal financial practices.
  • Authority and process:
    • Commission may retain outside experts (tax/revenue, nutrient pollution, water quality, wastewater infrastructure, economic analysis).
    • Must hold at least two public hearings in the southeastern region; experts may testify.
  • Deliverable:
    • Prepare a written report identifying funding sources, recommendations, and draft legislation (if any).
    • Submit initial report to the Governor, EOEEA Secretary, clerks of the legislature, chairs of Ways & Means and the Joint Committee on Environment and Natural Resources within 1 year after the resolve’s effective date.

Impact / implications

  • This is an investigatory and policy‑development body — it does not itself appropriate funds or create new taxes/fees.
  • Expected outcomes: a menu of financing options (e.g., state grants, loans, bonds, regional assessments, user fees, special local charges) and draft legislation to implement the commission’s recommendations.
  • Potential benefits: reduced nitrogen loading to coastal waters, improved water quality and public health, clearer financing pathways for municipalities.
  • Potential costs/impacts: recommendations may propose new or increased local/state revenue mechanisms that would affect municipal budgets, ratepayers, and taxpayers.

Timeline / Status (as provided)

  • Appointments: within 30 days of effective date; convening within 45 days thereafter.
  • Report: due within 1 year after effective date.
  • Administrative status in the packet shows various committee referrals and actions; if you need current legislative status, I can check the chamber’s docket to confirm up‑to‑date movement.

If you want, I can:
- Draft a short comparison of likely financing options the commission might recommend.
- Produce a one‑page handout summarizing municipal impacts for each named town.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.