WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 1327

Relates to establishing minimum standards for payment plans for eligible customers

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Leroy Comrie and 5 co-sponsors

The bill expands state labor protections to cover more employers and workers, broadens definitions (including ABC test for independent contractors), and clarifies enforcement to pr

REFERRED TO ENERGY
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 1327

Summary — S 1327 (Senate Docket No. 2280)

Note on source material: the documents provided include inconsistent metadata (a short title referencing payment-plan standards and a sponsors list that appears to be federal), but the primary bill text attached and the Senate docket (No. 2280) describe a Massachusetts state bill titled “An Act protecting labor and abolishing barriers to organizing rights.” This summary is based on the attached Massachusetts bill text (Senate No. 1327 / S.D. 2280). Verify final status and text with the official Massachusetts Legislature website before relying on this for legal or compliance decisions.

Purpose / Intent

The bill’s stated purpose is to protect labor and remove barriers to organizing rights in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts by strengthening and clarifying state labor law (principally G.L. c. 150A). It declares a state policy to promote collective bargaining, protect employee rights to organize, and ensure stable labor-management relations—particularly in situations where federal law does not apply or where federal agencies decline jurisdiction.

Key provisions and changes

  • Repeals sections 3 through 9 (inclusive) of Chapter 150 of the Massachusetts General Laws (text of those sections not included in supplied excerpts).
  • Amends Chapter 150A to add a new legislative declaration that:
    • G.L. c.150A will apply fully in the Commonwealth should federal law cease to preempt state regulation of private sector labor-management relations (in whole or in part), or if the National Labor Relations Board declines jurisdiction over an employer, employees, trade, or industry.
    • The Commonwealth has a vital interest in maximizing access to labor protections and ensuring effective labor-management relations.
  • Expands and clarifies definitions in G.L. c.150A:
    • Broadens the definition of “employer” to include persons with at least one employee and explicitly includes health care facilities, nonprofit institutions, and vendors that contract with or receive funds from the Commonwealth or its political subdivisions to provide social, medical, custodial, rehabilitative, educational, and similar services. (The Commonwealth itself and its political subdivisions are excluded except where a health care facility is involved.)
    • Broadens “employee” to include individuals whose work ceased because of a current labor dispute or an unfair labor practice and who have not obtained substantially equivalent employment; explicitly includes employees of health care facilities, nonprofits, and vendors contracting with the Commonwealth (with limited exclusions such as certain agricultural and domestic workers).
    • Adds an “ABC” test for determining independent contractor status (three-part test: control, outside usual course of employer business, independently established trade/profession).
  • Revises terminology for enforcement bodies: defines “department” as the Department of Labor Relations (under G.L. c. 23 §9O) and “board” as the Commonwealth Employment Relations Board (under G.L. c. 23 §9R).
  • (Additional amendments are indicated but truncated in the provided excerpt.)

Who would be affected

  • Private-sector employers operating in Massachusetts, including health care facilities, nonprofits, and vendors that contract with or receive Commonwealth funds.
  • Employees of those entities, including workers involved in labor disputes.
  • Independent contractors (through a clarified ABC test that may reclassify some workers as employees).
  • State agencies involved in labor relations enforcement (Department of Labor Relations; Commonwealth Employment Relations Board).

Potential impacts

  • Expands the reach of state labor protections and could enable broader access to collective-bargaining rights where federal preemption is absent or federal jurisdiction is declined.
  • May increase employer obligations and employer/contractor exposure to state labor-law claims, particularly for entities contracting with the Commonwealth.
  • Could prompt reclassification challenges for some independent contractors under the ABC test.
  • May produce administrative and fiscal effects (e.g., caseloads for state labor agencies, impacts on state contracting practices), though the bill text provided does not include explicit fiscal estimates.

Procedural status (from provided actions)

  • Introduced: 01/17/2025 (Senate Docket No. 2280) — presented by Senator Paul R. Feeney.
  • Reported and various committee actions are listed in the materials (dates include readings, committee referrals, hearings, and a committee favorable report dated 08/07/2025). The top metadata lists “Introduced 04/08/2025” and status “REFERRED TO ENERGY,” but the primary docket and text indicate this is a Massachusetts labor bill. Because the legislative-history entries appear inconsistent, consult the Massachusetts Legislature’s website for the bill’s current official status and latest enrolled text.

If you want, I can:
- Pull the current official bill text and status from the Massachusetts Legislature site (if you confirm you want that lookup), or
- Prepare a redlined comparison between current G.L. c.150A and the bill’s proposed changes (based on the full bill text).

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.