Relates to directing the state commissioner of parks, recreation and historic preservation to create a process to approve or deny certain new large urban telecommunication infrastructure

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Alex Bores

The bill requires the state parks commissioner to create a formal review process to approve or deny certain large urban telecommunication infrastructure projects.

REFERRED TO TOURISM, PARKS, ARTS AND SPORTS DEVELOPMENT

Quick Facts

Bill Number: A 8122 (Assembly)

Title: Relates to directing the state commissioner of parks, recreation and historic preservation to create a process to approve or deny certain new large urban telecommunication infrastructure

Sponsor: Alex Bores (primary)

Introduced: May 1, 2025

Current Status: Referred to the Tourism, Parks, Arts and Sports Development committee

Committee Action (Legislative History): Referred to Tourism, Parks, Arts and Sports Development on 2025-05-01 (listed twice in the record)

Related Legislation: Senate companion S 7417 (noted twice in the record)

Purpose and Intent

The bill directs the state commissioner of parks, recreation and historic preservation to establish a formal process for reviewing and making decisions on certain new large urban telecommunication infrastructure projects. The aim appears to be creating a standardized framework to approve or deny such infrastructure while considering the parks, recreation, and historic preservation context within the state.

Key Provisions (as described by title and summary)

Creation of a Review Process: The central requirement is for the commissioner to develop a formal process for approving or denying specified large urban telecommunication infrastructure projects.

Scope of Review: The bill indicates that the process will pertain to “certain” large urban telecom infrastructure, though the specific projects, thresholds, or criteria are not detailed in the available summary.

Agency Involvement: The process would be undertaken by the state commissioner responsible for parks, recreation and historic preservation, signaling a coordination with land use, historic preservation, and recreational considerations.

Note: The exact criteria, procedural steps, timelines, public notice requirements, appeal rights, and any documentation standards are not provided in the summary, so the specific mechanics remain unclear from the available information.

Affected Parties

State Agency: Office of the Commissioner of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (NY context) would be responsible for establishing and administering the process.

Telecommunication Projects: Developers and sponsors of large urban telecom infrastructure projects would be subject to the new approval/denial process.

Public/Stakeholders: Communities and stakeholders with interests in parks, recreation, and historic preservation could be involved or affected through the approval process, depending on how public input and notification are structured in the final version.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

Current Stage: Introduced and referred to a committee (Tourism, Parks, Arts and Sports Development).

Next Steps: The bill would advance through committee consideration, potential amendments, then floor debates and votes in the Assembly. If passed, it would move to the Senate for consideration, where a companion bill (S 7417) exists.

Companion Legislation: S 7417 is listed as the Senate counterpart, suggesting coordinated consideration if both chambers act on the policy.

Remarks

This summary reflects the information available from the bill’s introduction and committee referral notes. The operational details (definitions, thresholds, timelines, public participation, and appeal processes) will be clarified in the bill’s text as it advances through the legislative process.

Bill